Dimashkieh Mohiddin R, Yousief Salah A, Demachkia Amir M, Nassani Mohammad Zakaria, Samran Abdulaziz, Barakat Ali, Singh Yash Pal, Dimashkieh Reda M, El Sayed Hend Mohamed, Galal Rami M, Noushad Mohammed, Saini Monika
Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Dar Al Uloom University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Crown and Bridge, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Al Azhar University, Assiut Branch, Egypt.
Eur J Dent. 2025 Jul;19(3):667-677. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791761. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
The aim of this research is to evaluate/compare the use of traditional versus sleeve fixed partial denture (PD) designs made from different materials on supporting structures. The comparison included three- and four-unit PD cases.
Four finite element models are used in the research. The three-unit PD consists of the mandibular second premolar, first molar (as a pontic), and second molar. The four-unit PD includes the first premolar. The PD materials assessed were zirconia, E-max, and Celtra Duo. Bone has been simplified representing it as two cuboids. Each PD has been loaded to two cases over the pontic's central fossa: 300 N compressive, 150 N obliquely applied with 45 degrees forming 24 cases.
The three-unit traditional and sleeve PDs material change showed a slight change in cortical bone stress under vertical loading. Under oblique loading, cortical bone Von Mises stresses were higher by about 12 to 15% more than vertical loading. On the other hand, the four-unit PDs showed minor effect by changing PD material, while using sleeve design PD can reduce the cortical bone stresses up to 20% in comparison to traditional PD design. The mucosa and spongy bone were negligibly affected by changing PD material, and the traditional and sleeve designs showed close values to each other. Superiority of sleeve design appeared by reducing cement layer stresses dramatically, while PD body material rigidity affects its response.
Within the limitations of this study, the higher rigid PD material can dissipate loadings over it more preferably regarding its effect on the underlying structures. Sleeve PD design is equivalent to the traditional one for three-unit PDs, while it showed better performance with four-unit PDs. Zirconia three-unit PDs' bodies received the lowest stresses and redistributed and transferred the applied load to the underneath structures better than the other two tested materials. This finding was reversed with four-unit PDs.
本研究旨在评估/比较由不同材料制成的传统与套筒式固定局部义齿(PD)设计在支持结构上的使用情况。比较包括三单位和四单位PD病例。
本研究使用了四个有限元模型。三单位PD由下颌第二前磨牙、第一磨牙(作为桥体)和第二磨牙组成。四单位PD包括第一前磨牙。评估的PD材料有氧化锆、E-max和Celtra Duo。骨骼已被简化为两个长方体来表示。每个PD在桥体中央窝上加载两种情况:300 N压缩力、150 N以45度斜向施加,共形成24种情况。
三单位传统和套筒式PD的材料变化在垂直加载下皮质骨应力有轻微变化。在斜向加载下,皮质骨的冯·米塞斯应力比垂直加载时高约12%至15%。另一方面,四单位PD在改变PD材料时影响较小,而与传统PD设计相比,使用套筒设计的PD可将皮质骨应力降低多达20%。改变PD材料对黏膜和松质骨的影响可忽略不计,传统设计和套筒设计彼此的值相近。套筒设计的优势在于显著降低了粘结剂层应力,而PD主体材料的刚性会影响其反应情况。
在本研究的局限性内,较高刚性的PD材料在对其下方结构的影响方面能更优地消散其上的载荷。对于三单位PD,套筒式PD设计与传统设计相当,而对于四单位PD,它表现出更好的性能。三单位氧化锆PD主体承受的应力最低,并且比其他两种测试材料能更好地重新分布和传递施加的载荷至下方结构。对于四单位PD,这一发现则相反。