Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Jul;20(7):857-865.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 May 8.
Fear of falling (FoF) is common after hip fracture and can impede functional recovery because of activity restriction. The Fear of falling InTervention in HIP fracture geriatric rehabilitation (FIT-HIP intervention) was designed to target FoF and consequently to improve mobility. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the FIT-HIP intervention in patients with FoF in geriatric rehabilitation (GR) after hip fracture.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cluster-randomized controlled trial was performed in 11 post-acute GR units in the Netherlands (2016-2017). Six clusters were assigned to the intervention group, 5 to the usual care group. We included 78 patients with hip fracture and FoF (aged ≥65 years; 39 per group).
INTERVENTION(S): The FIT-HIP intervention is a multicomponent cognitive behavioral intervention conducted by physiotherapists, embedded in usual care in GR. The FIT-HIP intervention was compared to usual care in GR.
FoF was assessed with the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) and mobility, with the Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA). Data were collected at baseline, discharge, and 3 and 6 months postdischarge from GR. Primary endpoints were change scores at discharge. Linear mixed models were used to evaluate the treatment effect.
No significant between-group differences were observed for primary outcome measures. With the usual care group as reference, the FES-I estimated difference between mean change scores was 3.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) -1.0, 7.5, P = .13] at discharge from GR; -4.1 (95% CI -11.8, 3.6, P = .29) after 3 months; and -2.8 (95% CI -10.0, 4.4, P = .44) after 6 months. POMA estimated difference was -0.3 (95% CI -6.5, 5.8, P = .90).
CONCLUSION/IMPLICATIONS: The FIT-HIP intervention was not effective in reducing FoF. Possibly FoF (shortly) after hip fracture can to some extent be appropriate. This may imply the study was not able to accurately identify and accordingly treat FoF that is maladaptive (reflective of disproportionate anxiety).
髋部骨折后常发生跌倒恐惧(FoF),并因活动受限而妨碍功能恢复。设计 Fear of falling InTervention in HIP fracture geriatric rehabilitation(FIT-HIP 干预)的目的是针对 FoF,从而提高移动能力。本研究的目的是评估 FIT-HIP 干预在髋部骨折后老年康复(GR)中 FoF 患者中的效果。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在荷兰 11 个急性后 GR 单位进行的集群随机对照试验(2016-2017 年)。6 个集群被分配到干预组,5 个集群被分配到常规护理组。我们纳入了 78 名髋部骨折和 FoF(年龄≥65 岁;每组 39 名)的患者。
FIT-HIP 干预是由物理治疗师进行的多组分认知行为干预,嵌入在 GR 中的常规护理中。将 FIT-HIP 干预与 GR 中的常规护理进行比较。
FoF 采用跌倒效能量表-国际版(FES-I)评估,移动能力采用性能导向的移动评估(POMA)评估。数据在 GR 出院时、出院后 3 个月和 6 个月时收集。主要终点是出院时的变化评分。线性混合模型用于评估治疗效果。
主要结局指标无组间差异。以常规护理组为参照,FES-I 估计的平均变化评分差值在 GR 出院时为 3.3[95%置信区间(CI)-1.0,7.5,P=0.13];出院后 3 个月时为-4.1(95% CI -11.8,3.6,P=0.29);出院后 6 个月时为-2.8(95% CI -10.0,4.4,P=0.44)。POMA 估计的差值为-0.3(95% CI -6.5,5.8,P=0.90)。
结论/意义:FIT-HIP 干预并未有效降低 FoF。髋部骨折后不久,FoF 在一定程度上可能是合适的。这可能意味着该研究未能准确识别和相应治疗不适应的 FoF(反映过度焦虑)。