Jain Abhilash, Dunlop Rebecca, Hems Tim, Tang Jin Bo
1 Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
2 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2019 Jul;44(6):560-565. doi: 10.1177/1753193419846761. Epub 2019 May 12.
Current standard management of a cut digital nerve is end-to-end microsurgical nerve coaptation where possible. A recent systematic review of adult digital nerve injuries that were either repaired or left unrepaired showed that the evidence for good nerve recovery or improved function following nerve repair is poor. In the 30 studies included, only 24% of repaired nerves regained sensory recovery close to or equivalent to estimated pre-injury levels. Neuroma rates were the same in those nerves repaired (4.6%) and those not repaired (5%). Questions under debate include proper assessment methods of outcomes, decision making for repair or no repair to different fingers or the thumb, levels of injury, age, and hand dominance. This review summarizes the major evidence available and debates the surgical dogma that surrounds this injury.
目前,对于切割伤的指神经,标准治疗方法是尽可能进行端对端显微神经吻合术。最近一项关于成人指神经损伤修复或未修复的系统评价显示,神经修复后神经良好恢复或功能改善的证据不足。在纳入的30项研究中,只有24%的修复神经恢复的感觉接近或等同于受伤前估计水平。修复神经组(4.6%)和未修复神经组(5%)的神经瘤发生率相同。存在争议的问题包括结果的适当评估方法、不同手指或拇指修复或不修复的决策、损伤程度、年龄和利手。本综述总结了现有主要证据,并对围绕该损伤的手术教条进行了讨论。