Suppr超能文献

辐射健康影响研究为美国环境保护局的行动提供依据。

Studies of radiation health effects inform EPA actions.

作者信息

Pawel David, Boyd Michael

出版信息

J Radiol Prot. 2019 May 14;39(4):S40-S57. doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/ab2197.

Abstract

In 1970, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was given the responsibility to provide guidance to other federal agencies in the formulation of radiation protection standards. To carry out its federal guidance responsibilities and protect human health, the EPA must estimate risk at low doses to limit the risk of radiogenic cancers from environmental exposures. These risk estimates are based on models which conform to the linear no threshold (LNT) hypothesis. A cancer risk model conforms to the LNT hypothesis if the excess risk of cancer at low doses increases approximately proportional to dose, with no threshold. Risk models with a linear-quadratic dose response can satisfy the LNT hypothesis. Based on careful review of evidence from epidemiological and radiobiological studies, authoritative scientific bodies have repeatedly endorsed the use of LNT models for estimating and regulating risk and concluded that despite uncertainties at low dose and dose rates, the LNT model remains the most practical and implementable model for radiation protection. This article describes the rationale underlying the use of LNT models for calculating risk for low dose and dose rate exposures and discusses some of the epidemiological evidence which inform on its continued use.

摘要

1970年,美国环境保护局(EPA)被赋予向其他联邦机构提供辐射防护标准制定指导的职责。为履行其联邦指导职责并保护人类健康,EPA必须估算低剂量辐射风险,以限制环境暴露导致的辐射致癌风险。这些风险估算是基于符合线性无阈(LNT)假说的模型得出的。如果低剂量时癌症的超额风险随剂量近似成比例增加且无阈值,则癌症风险模型符合LNT假说。具有线性-二次剂量反应的风险模型可以满足LNT假说。基于对流行病学和放射生物学研究证据的仔细审查,权威科学机构多次认可使用LNT模型来估算和管理风险,并得出结论,尽管在低剂量和低剂量率下存在不确定性,但LNT模型仍然是辐射防护最实用且可实施的模型。本文描述了使用LNT模型计算低剂量和低剂量率暴露风险的基本原理,并讨论了一些支持其继续使用的流行病学证据。

相似文献

1
Studies of radiation health effects inform EPA actions.
J Radiol Prot. 2019 May 14;39(4):S40-S57. doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/ab2197.
2
Perspective on the use of LNT for radiation protection and risk assessment by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Dose Response. 2009 Aug 21;7(4):284-91. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.09-005.Puskin.
3
It Is Time to Move Beyond the Linear No-Threshold Theory for Low-Dose Radiation Protection.
Dose Response. 2018 Jul 1;16(3):1559325818779651. doi: 10.1177/1559325818779651. eCollection 2018 Jul-Sep.
4
A critical evaluation of the NCRP COMMENTARY 27 endorsement of the linear no-threshold model of radiation effects.
Environ Res. 2018 Nov;167:472-487. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
5
How self-interest and deception led to the adoption of the linear non-threshold dose response (LNT) model for cancer risk assessment.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Nov 10;898:165402. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165402. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
7
EPA adopts LNT: New historical perspectives.
Chem Biol Interact. 2019 Aug 1;308:110-112. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2019.05.027. Epub 2019 May 17.
8
The Linear No-Threshold Model of Low-Dose Radiogenic Cancer: A Failed Fiction.
Dose Response. 2019 Feb 7;17(1):1559325818824200. doi: 10.1177/1559325818824200. eCollection 2019 Jan-Mar.
9
Are We Approaching the End of the Linear No-Threshold Era?
J Nucl Med. 2018 Dec;59(12):1786-1793. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.217182. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
10
The scientific nature of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model used in the system of radiological protection.
Radiat Environ Biophys. 2024 Nov;63(4):483-489. doi: 10.1007/s00411-024-01092-1. Epub 2024 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Potential health effects of low dose radiation and what it means to the practice of radiation protection.
J Radiol Prot. 2019 Nov 22;39(4):E9-E13. doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/ab3fea.

本文引用的文献

1
The Million Person Study, whence it came and why.
Int J Radiat Biol. 2022;98(4):537-550. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2019.1589015. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
2
Solid Cancer Incidence among the Life Span Study of Atomic Bomb Survivors: 1958-2009.
Radiat Res. 2017 May;187(5):513-537. doi: 10.1667/RR14492.1. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
3
Childhood Leukemia and Primary Prevention.
Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2016 Oct;46(10):317-352. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2016.08.004.
4
Residential Exposure to Natural Background Radiation and Risk of Childhood Acute Leukemia in France, 1990-2009.
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Apr;125(4):714-720. doi: 10.1289/EHP296. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
7
A New Era of Low-Dose Radiation Epidemiology.
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2015 Sep;2(3):236-49. doi: 10.1007/s40572-015-0055-y.
8
EPI-CT: design, challenges and epidemiological methods of an international study on cancer risk after paediatric and young adult CT.
J Radiol Prot. 2015 Sep;35(3):611-28. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/35/3/611. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
9
Solid Cancer Incidence in the Techa River Incidence Cohort: 1956-2007.
Radiat Res. 2015 Jul;184(1):56-65. doi: 10.1667/RR14023.1. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
10
Radiation effects on mortality from solid cancers other than lung, liver, and bone cancer in the Mayak worker cohort: 1948-2008.
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 26;10(2):e0117784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117784. eCollection 2015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验