Suppr超能文献

EPA 采用 LNT:新的历史视角。

EPA adopts LNT: New historical perspectives.

机构信息

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Morrill I, N344, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.

出版信息

Chem Biol Interact. 2019 Aug 1;308:110-112. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2019.05.027. Epub 2019 May 17.

Abstract

This paper provides an historical assessment of how the linear non-threshold (LNT) model became adopted as policy by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) in 1975 [1] and how prior United States National Academy of Sciences (US NAS) radiation advisory panels may have affected this EPA decision. The paper highlights a generally unrecognized set of recommendations of the 1960 Biological Effect of Atomic Radiation [2] Genetics and Medical/Pathology Panels that did not support LNT for cancer risk assessment due to their judgements of its scientific limitations and unacceptable uncertainties. These convergent, independent and high profile recommendations were not promoted by the sponsors (i.e., Rockefeller Foundation and the NAS), and were ignored by the media, Congress and the scientific community in contrast to the vast attention directed to the linearity recommendation for germ cell mutation by the BEAR Genetics Panel in 1956 [3,4]. The subsequent Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR) I Committee (1972) [5] report ignored these BEAR Panel (1960) [2] recommendations, only commenting on the BEAR 1956 linearity supporting recommendation [3,4]. These actions are documented and assessed for how they influenced why and how EPA adopted linearity for cancer risk assessment based on the BEIR I report.

摘要

本文对线性无阈(LNT)模型如何于 1975 年被美国环境保护署(EPA)采纳为政策[1],以及美国国家科学院(NAS)先前的辐射咨询小组如何影响这一 EPA 决策进行了历史评估。本文重点介绍了 1960 年《原子辐射生物效应》[2]遗传学和医学/病理学小组中一组普遍未被认识到的建议,由于其对科学局限性和不可接受的不确定性的判断,这些建议不支持 LNT 用于癌症风险评估。这些具有一致性、独立性和显著影响力的建议没有得到赞助商(即洛克菲勒基金会和 NAS)的支持,也被媒体、国会和科学界忽视,相比之下,1956 年《BEAR 遗传学小组》对生殖细胞突变的线性性建议则受到了广泛关注[3,4]。随后的《电离辐射的生物学效应》(BEIR)I 委员会(1972 年)[5]报告忽略了这些 BEAR 小组(1960 年)[2]的建议,仅对支持线性性的 1956 年 BEAR 建议进行了评论[3,4]。本文记录并评估了这些建议是如何影响 EPA 基于 BEIR I 报告为何以及如何采用线性性进行癌症风险评估的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验