• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有和不具有阴性结果的随机临床试验的发表后指标。

Postpublication Metrics of Randomized Clinical Trials With and Without Null Findings.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco.

Computational Behavioral Science Laboratory, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA. 2019 May 14;321(18):1825-1826. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.2994.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2019.2994
PMID:31087013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6518340/
Abstract

This study examined the association between RCT findings supporting or rejecting the trials’ experimental hypotheses and postpublication metrics reflecting scientific and public interest; namely, citations, Altimetric scores, and views.

摘要

本研究考察了 RCT 研究结果（支持或反对试验的实验假设）与反映科学和公众兴趣的出版物后指标（即引用、Altimetric 分数和浏览量）之间的关联。

相似文献

1
Postpublication Metrics of Randomized Clinical Trials With and Without Null Findings.具有和不具有阴性结果的随机临床试验的发表后指标。
JAMA. 2019 May 14;321(18):1825-1826. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.2994.
2
The significance of the peer review process against the background of bias: priority ratings of reviewers and editors and the prediction of citation, the role of geographical bias.同行评审过程在偏见背景下的意义：评审人员和编辑的优先级评级以及引文预测、地域偏见的作用。
Cardiovasc Res. 2002 Dec;56(3):339-46. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(02)00712-5.
3
Research on peer review and biomedical publication: furthering the quest to improve the quality of reporting.同行评审与生物医学出版研究：推动提高报告质量的探索
JAMA. 2014 Mar 12;311(10):1019-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.1362.
4
Bad science, sloppy reporting, and retracted publications: should peer review be the scapegoat?糟糕的科学、草率的报道和撤稿的出版物：同行评议应该成为替罪羊吗？
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2014 Jun;35(6):411-2. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2014.907685.
5
Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature.麻醉学文献中的发表偏倚。
Anesth Analg. 2012 May;114(5):1042-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182468fc6. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
6
Quality of reports of randomised trials and estimates of treatment efficacy.随机试验报告的质量与治疗效果评估
Lancet. 1998 Nov 7;352(9139):1555-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)60369-8.
7
Keeping track of trials.追踪试验。
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Sep;40(9):1967-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546512459510.
8
Multi-authors' self-citation: a further impact factor bias?多位作者的自引：另一种影响因子偏差？
Cortex. 2008 Oct;44(9):1139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.07.001. Epub 2008 Jul 6.
9
Biomedical publishing. Secretive and subjective, peer review proves resistant to study.生物医学出版。同行评审隐秘且主观，事实证明难以对其进行研究。
Science. 2013 Sep 20;341(6152):1331. doi: 10.1126/science.341.6152.1331.
10
Publication bias in epidemiological studies.流行病学研究中的发表偏倚。
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2011 Jun;19(2):118-20. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a3581.

引用本文的文献

1
A multivariate model for successful publication of intensive care medicine randomized controlled trials in the highest impact factor journals: the SCOTI score.在影响因子最高的期刊上成功发表重症医学随机对照试验的多变量模型：SCOTI评分
Ann Intensive Care. 2021 Nov 27;11(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00954-x.
2
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Remediate Age-Related Cognitive Decline in Healthy Older Adults.经颅直流电刺激改善健康老年人与年龄相关认知衰退的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021 Mar 29;17:971-990. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S259499. eCollection 2021.
3
Lessons learned from two randomized controlled trials: CITIES and STOP-DKD.从两项随机对照试验中汲取的经验教训：CITIES和STOP-DKD。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Jul 8;19:100612. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100612. eCollection 2020 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
High-Impact Articles-Citations, Downloads, and Altmetric Score.高影响力文章——引用次数、下载量和替代计量学得分
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015 Sep-Oct;17(5):323-4. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2015.0869.
2
Social science. Publication bias in the social sciences: unlocking the file drawer.社会科学。社会科学中的发表偏倚：开启档案柜。
Science. 2014 Sep 19;345(6203):1502-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1255484. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
3
Perceived information gain from randomized trials correlates with publication in high-impact factor journals.从随机试验中获得的感知信息增益与在高影响力因子期刊上发表的内容相关。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;65(12):1274-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.06.009. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
4
Publication bias and clinical trials.发表偏倚与临床试验
Control Clin Trials. 1987 Dec;8(4):343-53. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(87)90155-3.