• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

静脉溶栓预处理对机械取栓治疗急性脑卒中患者再灌注状态的影响。

Impact of pretreatment with intravenous thrombolysis on reperfusion status in acute strokes treated with mechanical thrombectomy.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee/Semmes-Murphey Clinic, Memphis, Tennesseee, United States.

出版信息

J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Nov;11(11):1073-1079. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014746. Epub 2019 May 14.

DOI:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014746
PMID:31088941
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We sought to evaluate the impact of pretreatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) on the rate and speed of successful reperfusion (SR) in patients with emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in a high-volume tertiary care stroke center.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with ELVO treated with MT were evaluated. Outcomes were compared between patients who underwent combined IVT and MT (IVT+MT) and those treated with direct MT (dMT). The elapsed time between groin puncture to beginning of reperfusion (GPTBRT) and the numbers of device passes required to achieve SR were also documented.

RESULTS

A total of 287 and 132 patients were treated with IVT+MT and dMT, respectively. The IVT+MT group had higher SR (73.8% vs 62.9%; p=0.023) and 3-month functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2;51.6% vs 38.2%; p=0.008) rates. The median GPTBRT was shorter in the IVT+MT group (48 (IQR 33-70) vs 70 (IQR 44-98) min; p<0.001). Among patients who achieved SR (n=292), the median number of required device passes was lower in the IVT+MT subgroup (1 (IQR 1-1) vs 2 (IQR 1-2); p<0.001), while the rate of patients requiring ≤2 device passes was higher (98% vs 77%; p<0.001). IVT+MT was independently related to higher odds of SR (OR 1.64; 95% CI 1.03 to 2.61; p=0.036) and shorter GPTBRT (unstandardized linear regression coefficient -20.39; 95% CI -27.56 to -13.22; p<0.001) on multivariable analyses adjusting for potential confounders. Among patients with SR, IVT+MT was independently associated with a higher likelihood of ≤2 device passes (OR 14.63; 95% CI 4.46 to 48.00; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

IVT pretreatment appears to increase the rates of SR and shortens the duration of the endovascular procedure by requiring fewer device passes in patients with ELVO treated with MT.

摘要

简介

我们旨在评估在高容量的三级卒中中心中,对接受机械血栓切除术(MT)治疗的紧急大血管闭塞(ELVO)患者进行静脉溶栓(IVT)预处理对成功再灌注(SR)的速度和速度的影响。

方法

评估了接受 MT 治疗的 ELVO 连续患者。比较了联合 IVT 和 MT(IVT+MT)治疗的患者与直接 MT(dMT)治疗的患者之间的结果。还记录了从腹股沟穿刺到开始再灌注(GPTBRT)之间的时间以及达到 SR 所需的设备通过次数。

结果

共有 287 名和 132 名患者分别接受了 IVT+MT 和 dMT 治疗。IVT+MT 组 SR(73.8%比 62.9%;p=0.023)和 3 个月功能独立性(改良 Rankin 量表评分 0-2;51.6%比 38.2%;p=0.008)的比例更高。IVT+MT 组的中位 GPTBRT 更短(48(IQR 33-70)比 70(IQR 44-98)分钟;p<0.001)。在达到 SR 的患者中(n=292),IVT+MT 亚组所需设备通过的中位数更低(1(IQR 1-1)比 2(IQR 1-2);p<0.001),而需要≤2 次设备通过的患者比例更高(98%比 77%;p<0.001)。IVT+MT 与更高的 SR 几率独立相关(OR 1.64;95%CI 1.03 至 2.61;p=0.036)和 GPTBRT 更短(多变量分析调整潜在混杂因素后,标准化线性回归系数-20.39;95%CI-27.56 至-13.22;p<0.001)。在达到 SR 的患者中,IVT+MT 与需要≤2 次设备通过的可能性更高独立相关(OR 14.63;95%CI 4.46 至 48.00;p<0.001)。

结论

在接受 MT 治疗的 ELVO 患者中,IVT 预处理似乎通过减少设备通过次数,增加了 SR 的速度,并缩短了血管内手术的持续时间。

相似文献

1
Impact of pretreatment with intravenous thrombolysis on reperfusion status in acute strokes treated with mechanical thrombectomy.静脉溶栓预处理对机械取栓治疗急性脑卒中患者再灌注状态的影响。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Nov;11(11):1073-1079. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014746. Epub 2019 May 14.
2
Intravenous thrombolysis pretreatment and other predictors of infarct in a new previously unaffected territory (INT) in ELVO strokes treated with mechanical thrombectomy.机械取栓治疗的 ELVO 卒中中新的未受影响部位(INT)的静脉溶栓预处理和其他梗死预测因素。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Feb;12(2):142-147. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014935. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
3
Antiplatelet pretreatment and outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy for emergent large vessel occlusion strokes.抗血小板预处理对机械取栓治疗急性大血管闭塞性脑卒中的影响。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Sep;10(9):828-833. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013532. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
4
Comparative safety and efficacy of combined IVT and MT with direct MT in large vessel occlusion.比较大血管闭塞患者联合血管内治疗和直接机械取栓的安全性和有效性。
Neurology. 2018 Apr 10;90(15):e1274-e1282. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005299. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
5
Short and long-term outcomes after combined intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy versus direct mechanical thrombectomy: a prospective single-center study.静脉溶栓联合机械取栓与直接机械取栓后的短期和长期结局:一项前瞻性单中心研究。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017 Aug;44(2):203-209. doi: 10.1007/s11239-017-1527-8.
6
Association Between Intravenous Thrombolysis and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Ischemic Stroke and Unsuccessful Mechanical Reperfusion.静脉溶栓治疗与机械取栓再通失败的缺血性脑卒中患者临床结局的相关性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2310213. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.10213.
7
Comparison of Outcomes After Mechanical Thrombectomy Alone or Combined with Intravenous Thrombolysis and Mechanical Thrombectomy for Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke due to Large Vessel Occlusion.单纯机械取栓或联合静脉溶栓与机械取栓治疗大血管闭塞性急性缺血性脑卒中患者的疗效比较
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;114:e165-e172. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.126. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
8
Mechanical Thrombectomy Outcomes With and Without Intravenous Thrombolysis in Stroke Patients: A Meta-Analysis.卒中患者接受与未接受静脉溶栓治疗的机械取栓结果:一项荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2017 Sep;48(9):2450-2456. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017320. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
9
Mechanical Thrombectomy Outcomes With or Without Intravenous Thrombolysis.机械取栓术联合或不联合静脉溶栓治疗的效果。
Stroke. 2018 Oct;49(10):2383-2390. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021500.
10
Successful Reperfusion With Intravenous Thrombolysis Preceding Mechanical Thrombectomy in Large-Vessel Occlusions.在大血管闭塞性病变中,机械取栓术前静脉溶栓成功实现再灌注。
Stroke. 2018 Jan;49(1):232-235. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019261. Epub 2017 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of bridging intravenous thrombolysis and infarct core growth rate on early neurological improvement in patients with acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke and mechanical thrombectomy.桥接静脉溶栓和梗死核心生长率对急性前循环缺血性卒中患者接受机械取栓术后早期神经功能改善的影响
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Apr 29:15910199251336889. doi: 10.1177/15910199251336889.
2
Bridging therapy versus direct endovascular thrombectomy in patients with established large infarct: a prospective cohort study.已发生大面积梗死患者的桥接治疗与直接血管内血栓切除术:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2025 Jan 1;111(1):520-528. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002017.
3
Thrombectomy versus combined thrombolysis and thrombectomy in patients with large vessel occlusion and chronic kidney disease.
大血管闭塞合并慢性肾脏病患者的血栓切除术与溶栓联合血栓切除术对比研究
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 13;10(4):e26110. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26110. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
4
Effect of Clot Burden Score on Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Alteplase Prior to Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized Phase 3 Trial.急性缺血性脑卒中机械取栓前静脉注射阿替普酶的血栓负担评分对安全性和疗效的影响:一项随机 3 期试验的亚组分析。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 Mar 7;45(3):296-301. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8134.
5
No-reflow after stroke reperfusion therapy: An emerging phenomenon to be explored.卒中再灌注治疗后的无复流现象:一个有待探索的新兴现象。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024 Feb;30(2):e14631. doi: 10.1111/cns.14631.
6
Ischemia-reperfusion injury: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets.缺血再灌注损伤:分子机制与治疗靶点。
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024 Jan 8;9(1):12. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01688-x.
7
Mechanical thrombectomy combined with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analyses.机械取栓联合静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 26;13(1):8597. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35532-7.
8
Nomogram-Based Prediction of the Futile Recanalization Risk Among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Before and After Endovascular Therapy: A Retrospective Study.基于列线图预测急性缺血性卒中患者血管内治疗前后再通失败风险:一项回顾性研究
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2023 Apr 13;19:879-894. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S400463. eCollection 2023.
9
Computational analysis of effects of clot length on Acute ischemic stroke recanalization under different cyclic aspiration loading conditions.计算分析不同循环抽吸负荷条件下血栓长度对急性缺血性脑卒中再通的影响。
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2023 Feb;39(2):e3667. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3667. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
10
Does prior administration of rtPA influence acute ischemic stroke clot composition? Findings from the analysis of clots retrieved with mechanical thrombectomy from the RESTORE registry.rtPA 预先给药是否会影响急性缺血性脑卒中血栓的成分?RESTEOR 登记研究中机械取栓取出的血栓分析结果。
J Neurol. 2022 Apr;269(4):1913-1920. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10758-5. Epub 2021 Aug 20.