比较 40 岁以下女性的保乳治疗与乳房切除术:国家趋势和潜在的生存影响。

Comparison of breast-conserving therapy vs mastectomy in women under age 40: National trends and potential survival implications.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, BreastCare Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Breast J. 2019 Jul;25(4):578-584. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13293. Epub 2019 May 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite initial increased rates of breast-conserving therapy compared to mastectomy after 1990, mastectomy rates have increased in women under age 40 since 2000. Our study explores the demographic and survival implications of this trend.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was used to study stage 1 breast cancer diagnosed in women under age 40 between 2004 and 2014. Demographic and clinical data were obtained. Multivariable regression and survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of 11 859 patients under age 40, 57.2% underwent mastectomy (39.0% unilateral and 61.0% bilateral) rather than breast-conserving therapy (42.8%). The rate of mastectomy was significantly higher in 2014 compared to 2004 (43.6% in 2004 vs 62.4% in 2014; P < 0.001). The rate of bilateral mastectomy was significantly higher in 2014 compared to 2004 in contrast to unilateral mastectomy (31.7% in 2004 vs 73.0% in 2014; P < 0.001). Non-Hispanic Caucasian ethnicity and private insurance status were predictors of bilateral mastectomy (OR 2.06 [95% CI: 1.84-2.30], P < 0.001; OR 1.39 [95% CI: 1.21-1.59], P < 0.001). Controlling for demographics, tumor grade, and adjuvant therapies, bilateral mastectomy was associated with significantly increased 10-year survival vs unilateral mastectomy (HR 0.75 [0.59-0.96], P = 0.023). Additionally, breast-conserving therapy was associated with significantly increased 10-year survival vs unilateral (HR 2.36 [95% CI: 1.83-3.05]; P < 0.001) and bilateral mastectomy (HR 2.30 [95% CI: 1.61-3.27]; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of women under age 40 with stage 1 invasive breast cancer underwent mastectomy instead of breast-conserving therapy. This largely reflects increased rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Bilateral mastectomy and breast-conserving therapy vs unilateral mastectomy were associated with a small but significant increase in survival. This finding warrants further investigation to determine the clinical implications of decision-making in younger women.

摘要

简介

尽管 1990 年后保乳治疗的初始比率高于乳房切除术,但自 2000 年以来,40 岁以下女性的乳房切除术比率有所上升。我们的研究探讨了这一趋势的人口统计学和生存意义。

方法

使用国家癌症数据库研究 2004 年至 2014 年间诊断为 40 岁以下的 1 期乳腺癌患者。获取人口统计学和临床数据。进行多变量回归和生存分析。

结果

在 11859 名 40 岁以下的患者中,57.2%(39.0%单侧,61.0%双侧)接受了乳房切除术,而非保乳治疗(42.8%)。与 2004 年相比,2014 年乳房切除术的比率显著更高(2004 年为 43.6%,2014 年为 62.4%;P<0.001)。与单侧乳房切除术相比,2014 年双侧乳房切除术的比率明显更高(2004 年为 31.7%,2014 年为 73.0%;P<0.001)。非西班牙裔白种人和私人保险状况是双侧乳房切除术的预测因素(OR 2.06 [95% CI: 1.84-2.30],P<0.001;OR 1.39 [95% CI: 1.21-1.59],P<0.001)。在控制人口统计学、肿瘤分级和辅助治疗后,与单侧乳房切除术相比,双侧乳房切除术的 10 年生存率显著提高(HR 0.75 [0.59-0.96],P=0.023)。此外,与单侧乳房切除术(HR 2.36 [95% CI: 1.83-3.05];P<0.001)和双侧乳房切除术(HR 2.30 [95% CI: 1.61-3.27];P<0.001)相比,保乳治疗与 10 年生存率显著提高相关。

结论

大多数患有 1 期浸润性乳腺癌的 40 岁以下女性接受了乳房切除术,而非保乳治疗。这在很大程度上反映了对侧预防性乳房切除术的增加。与单侧乳房切除术相比,双侧乳房切除术和保乳治疗与生存的小但显著增加有关。这一发现值得进一步研究,以确定年轻女性决策的临床意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索