Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Room C-308, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan;173(2):301-311. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-5007-4. Epub 2018 Oct 20.
Breast conservation therapy (BCT) is standard for T1-T2 tumors, but early trials excluded breast cancers > 5 cm. This study was performed to assess patterns and outcomes of BCT for T3 tumors.
We reviewed the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for noninflammatory breast cancers > 5 cm, between 2004 and 2011 who underwent BCT or mastectomy (Mtx) with nodal evaluation. Patients with skin or chest wall involvement were excluded. Patients having clinical T3 tumors were analyzed to determine outcomes based upon presentation, with those having pathologic T3 tumors, subsequently assessed, irrespective of presentation. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, with adjusted survival curves estimated using inverse probability weighting.
After exclusions, 37,268 patients remained. Median age and tumor size for BCT versus Mtx were 53 versus 54 years (p < 0.001) and 6.0 versus 6.7 cm (p < 0.001), respectively. Predictors of BCT included age, race, location, facility type, year of diagnosis, tumor size, grade, histology, nodes examined and positive, and administration of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. OS was similar between Mtx and BCT (p = 0.36). This held true when neoadjuvant chemotherapy patients were excluded (p = 0.39). BCT percentages declined over time (p < 0.001), while tumor sizes remained the same (p = 0.77). Median follow-up was 51.4 months.
OS for patients with T3 breast cancers is similar whether patients received Mtx or BCT, confirming that tumor size should not be an absolute BCT exclusion. Declining use of BCT for tumors > 5 cm in younger patients may be accounted for by recent trends toward mastectomy.
保乳治疗(BCT)是 T1-T2 肿瘤的标准治疗方法,但早期试验排除了肿瘤直径大于 5cm 的乳腺癌。本研究旨在评估 T3 肿瘤行 BCT 的模式和结果。
我们回顾了 2004 年至 2011 年间在国家癌症数据库(NCDB)中接受 BCT 或乳房切除术(Mtx)并进行淋巴结评估的非炎性乳腺癌,肿瘤直径大于 5cm。排除皮肤或胸壁受累的患者。对临床 T3 肿瘤患者进行分析,以确定基于表现的治疗结果,对病理 T3 肿瘤患者,无论表现如何,均进行评估。使用多变量 Cox 比例风险模型分析总生存(OS),使用逆概率加权估计调整后的生存曲线。
排除后,共 37268 例患者入选。BCT 与 Mtx 相比,中位年龄和肿瘤大小分别为 53 岁和 54 岁(p<0.001)和 6.0cm 和 6.7cm(p<0.001)。BCT 的预测因素包括年龄、种族、位置、医疗机构类型、诊断年份、肿瘤大小、分级、组织学、检查和阳性淋巴结以及化疗和放疗的应用。Mtx 和 BCT 之间的 OS 相似(p=0.36)。排除新辅助化疗患者后也是如此(p=0.39)。随着时间的推移,BCT 的比例下降(p<0.001),而肿瘤大小保持不变(p=0.77)。中位随访时间为 51.4 个月。
对于 T3 乳腺癌患者,接受 Mtx 或 BCT 的患者的 OS 相似,证实肿瘤大小不应成为绝对排除 BCT 的标准。年轻患者肿瘤直径大于 5cm 时 BCT 使用率下降,可能归因于近期乳房切除术的趋势。