University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Columbia University.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2018 Dec 1;43(6):1025-1040. doi: 10.1215/03616878-7104431.
Organized medicine long yearned for the demise of Medicare's Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) formula for updating physician fees. Congress finally obliged in 2015, repealing the SGR as part of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA). MACRA established value-based metrics for physician payment and financial incentives for doctors to join alternative delivery models like patient-centered medical homes. Throughout the law's initial implementation, the politics of accommodation prevailed, with federal officials crafting final rules that made MACRA more favorable for physicians. However, the era of accommodation could be short-lived. The discretion that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services had during the first two years of implementation is ending. Additionally, euphoria over the SGR's repeal has given way to concerns over the new program's value-based purchasing arrangements and uncertainty over their sustainability. MACRA eliminated the SGR, but not the politics of physician payment.
多年来,有组织的医学界一直渴望废除医疗保险的可持续增长率(SGR)公式,以更新医生的费用。国会最终在 2015 年同意了这一请求,作为医疗保险获得和儿童健康保险计划(CHIP)再授权法案(MACRA)的一部分,废除了 SGR。MACRA 为医生的支付建立了基于价值的指标,并为医生加入以患者为中心的医疗之家等替代交付模式提供了财务激励。在该法律的初步实施过程中,权宜之计占了上风,联邦官员制定了最终规则,使 MACRA 对医生更加有利。然而,这种权宜之计可能是短暂的。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心在实施的头两年所拥有的酌处权即将结束。此外,对 SGR 废除的欣喜若狂已经让位于对新计划基于价值的采购安排的担忧,以及对其可持续性的不确定性。MACRA 虽然废除了 SGR,但并没有改变医生支付的政治。