Peters R M, Brimm J E, Utley J R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1979 Feb;77(2):175-82.
Forty-nine cardiac surgical patients had ventilatory function tests and measurements of maximum inspiratory (MIP) and maximum expiratory (MEP) pressures preoperatively. The differences between the values of various function tests were compared for patients requiring less than 24 hours of ventilator support and those requiring more than 24 hours. There was a significant difference in the mean values for the two groups in vital capacity (VC) first-second forced expired volume (FEV) midexpiratory flow between 50 and 75 (MMEF 50--75) and 75--85 percent of expired volume (MMEF 75--85), and MEP. The standard deviations of each of the variables were so large that the clinical usefulness was limited. However, when discriminant analysis was used for more than one variable, the combination of MMEF 75--85 and MEP predicted success or failure to wean in 24 hours correctly in 90 percent of instances. On the basis of these simple tests, patients predicted to succeed should be weaned from ventilator support on recovery from anesthesia. Those predicted to fail should be placed on intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) and should be weaned following a planned, logical process.
49名心脏外科手术患者在术前进行了通气功能测试,并测量了最大吸气压力(MIP)和最大呼气压力(MEP)。对需要呼吸机支持少于24小时的患者和需要超过24小时的患者,比较了各项功能测试值之间的差异。两组在肺活量(VC)、第一秒用力呼气量(FEV)、50%至75%呼气量之间的中期呼气流量(MMEF 50-75)、75%至85%呼气量之间的中期呼气流量(MMEF 75-85)以及MEP的平均值上存在显著差异。每个变量的标准差都很大,以至于临床实用性有限。然而,当对多个变量进行判别分析时,MMEF 75-85和MEP的组合在90%的情况下能正确预测24小时内撤机的成功或失败。基于这些简单测试,预计能成功撤机的患者在麻醉恢复后应停止呼吸机支持。预计会失败的患者应采用间歇强制通气(IMV),并应按照计划、合理的过程撤机。