From the Department of Anesthesiology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Anesth Analg. 2019 Jun;128(6):1336-1343. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003421.
The objective of the experiment was to assess the antinociceptive effect of dibucaine, bupivacaine, and epinephrine. To assess the mechanism of action of the interaction between dibucaine and epinephrine, phentolamine, a nonselective α-adrenergic antagonist, was added to the mixture.
We assessed sensory blockade with these drugs by injecting 0.6 mL of drug-in-saline in the dorsal thoracolumbar area of rats; pinprick of the "wheal" formed by the injectate was the area targeted for stimulation to elicit a cutaneous trunci muscle reflex. The sensory block of dibucaine was compared with that of bupivacaine or epinephrine. Drug-drug interactions were analyzed by isobologram. Phentolamine was added to investigate the antinociceptive effect of dibucaine coinjected with epinephrine.
We demonstrated that dibucaine, epinephrine, and bupivacaine produced dose-dependent skin antinociception. On the median effective dose (ED50) basis, the potency was higher for epinephrine (mean, 0.011 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.007-0.015] μmol) than for dibucaine (mean, 0.493 [95% CI, 0.435-0.560] μmol) (P < .01), while there were no significant differences between dibucaine and bupivacaine (mean, 0.450 [95% CI, 0.400-0.505] μmol). On the equipotent basis (75% effective dose, median effective dose, and 25% effective dose), sensory block duration provoked by epinephrine was greater (P < .01) than that provoked by dibucaine or bupivacaine. Coadministration of dibucaine with epinephrine produced a synergistic nociceptive block, whereas phentolamine blocked that synergistic block.
The preclinical data indicated that there is no statistically significant difference between the potency and duration of dibucaine and bupivacaine in this model. Epinephrine synergistically enhances the effects of dibucaine, while phentolamine partially blocked those effects. α-Adrenergic receptors play an important role in controlling synergistic analgesic effect of dibucaine combined with epinephrine.
实验目的是评估地布卡因、布比卡因和肾上腺素的抗伤害作用。为了评估地布卡因和肾上腺素相互作用的作用机制,向混合物中加入了非选择性α-肾上腺素能拮抗剂酚妥拉明。
我们通过在大鼠背胸腰椎区域注射 0.6 毫升含药生理盐水来评估这些药物的感觉阻滞作用;刺激注射形成的“风团”来评估皮肤竖脊肌反射的感觉阻滞作用。比较了地布卡因与布比卡因或肾上腺素的感觉阻滞作用。通过等比图形分析药物-药物相互作用。加入酚妥拉明以研究地布卡因与肾上腺素共注射时的抗伤害作用。
我们证明了地布卡因、肾上腺素和布比卡因均产生剂量依赖性皮肤镇痛作用。基于中效剂量(ED50),肾上腺素的效能(平均,0.011 [95%置信区间{CI},0.007-0.015] μmol)高于地布卡因(平均,0.493 [95% CI,0.435-0.560] μmol)(P <.01),而地布卡因和布比卡因之间没有显著差异(平均,0.450 [95% CI,0.400-0.505] μmol)。在等效基础上(75%有效剂量、中效剂量和 25%有效剂量),肾上腺素引起的感觉阻滞持续时间更长(P <.01)。地布卡因与肾上腺素联合使用可产生协同的痛觉阻滞作用,而酚妥拉明可阻断这种协同阻滞作用。
临床前数据表明,在该模型中,地布卡因和布比卡因的效力和持续时间之间没有统计学上的显著差异。肾上腺素协同增强地布卡因的作用,而酚妥拉明部分阻断了这些作用。α-肾上腺素能受体在控制地布卡因与肾上腺素联合使用的协同镇痛作用中发挥重要作用。