Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Jul 1;145(7):669-675. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.0710.
Many survivors of Ebola virus infection describe new-onset hearing loss after infection. The prevalence, severity, and pathophysiologic features of hearing loss in this population have not been well characterized.
To perform a systematic review of the current literature to characterize hearing loss in survivors of Ebola virus infection.
This study adhered to the relevant sections of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Searches through PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were performed to include publications written in English from January 1, 1965, to October 1, 2018. Relevant vocabulary terms and key terms related to Ebola and hearing loss were used. Two investigators independently screened the eligible studies, extracted data, and assessed quality and risk of bias.
Of 127 publications reviewed, 15 met the criteria for inclusion; 3 were retrospective case-control studies (level of evidence, 3), and 12 were cross-sectional studies or case reports (level of evidence, 4). Studies included 1775 survivors of Ebola virus infection (993 female [55.9%]) and 363 uninfected controls (186 female [51.2%]) from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Uganda, Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone. The duration of follow-up ranged from 0 to 29 months (median, 5 months). Hearing loss was reported in 147 survivors of Ebola virus infection (8.3%). Among studies that compared survivors with controls, the reported odds ratios for hearing loss in survivors was 7.50 (95% CI, 3.91-14.39; range, 1.4-12.1). Including all studies, the odds ratio of hearing loss in survivors vs controls in countries where Ebola virus infection is endemic was 1.84 (95% CI, 1.10-3.08).
Survivors of Ebola virus infection had higher rates of hearing loss than uninfected controls in regions where the infection is endemic. Further research with consistent objective methods and pure-tone audiometry may be needed to better characterize the hearing loss, understand its pathophysiologic features, and develop treatments.
许多埃博拉病毒感染者在感染后会出现新发听力损失。该人群的听力损失的流行率、严重程度和病理生理特征尚未得到很好的描述。
对现有文献进行系统回顾,以描述埃博拉病毒感染者的听力损失情况。
本研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)报告指南的相关章节。通过 PubMed、Embase 和 Google Scholar 进行了搜索,纳入了 1965 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 10 月 1 日发表的英文出版物。使用了与埃博拉和听力损失相关的相关词汇术语和关键词。两名调查员独立筛选合格研究,提取数据,并评估质量和偏倚风险。
在审查的 127 篇出版物中,有 15 篇符合纳入标准;其中 3 篇为回顾性病例对照研究(证据水平 3),12 篇为横断面研究或病例报告(证据水平 4)。研究包括来自刚果民主共和国、乌干达、几内亚、利比里亚和塞拉利昂的 1775 名埃博拉病毒感染者(993 名女性[55.9%])和 363 名未感染者(186 名女性[51.2%])。随访时间从 0 至 29 个月不等(中位数为 5 个月)。147 名埃博拉病毒感染者(8.3%)报告听力损失。在将幸存者与对照组进行比较的研究中,报告的幸存者听力损失的比值比为 7.50(95%CI,3.91-14.39;范围,1.4-12.1)。包括所有研究在内,在埃博拉病毒感染流行的国家中,幸存者与对照组相比听力损失的比值比为 1.84(95%CI,1.10-3.08)。
在感染流行地区,埃博拉病毒感染者的听力损失发生率高于未感染者。可能需要进一步开展具有一致客观方法和纯音测听的研究,以更好地描述听力损失,了解其病理生理特征并开发治疗方法。