Suppr超能文献

培美曲塞或培美曲塞联合贝伐珠单抗治疗未经治疗的老年非鳞非小细胞肺癌的随机 II 期研究:九州肺癌研究组(LOGIK1201)的结果。

Randomized phase II study of pemetrexed or pemetrexed plus bevacizumab for elderly patients with previously untreated non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: Results of the Lung Oncology Group in Kyushu (LOGIK1201).

机构信息

Clinical Oncology Center, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.

Division of Respiratory Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Nagasaki Genbaku Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.

出版信息

Lung Cancer. 2019 Jun;132:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Apr 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety, we conducted a randomized phase II study of pemetrexed (Pem) versus Pem + bevacizumab (Bev) for elderly patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSqNSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The eligibility criteria were as follows: NSqNSCLC, no prior therapy, stage IIIB/IV disease or postoperative recurrence, age: ≥75 years, performance status (PS): 0-1, and adequate bone marrow function. The patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive Pem or Pem + Bev. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were the response rate, OS, toxicities, and cost-effectiveness.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were enrolled and 40 (20 from each group) were assessable. Their characteristics were as follows: male/female = 23/17; median age (range) = 78 (75-83); stage IIIB/IV/postoperative recurrence = 1/30/9; PS 0/1 = 11/29. All cases involved adenocarcinoma. There was no significant intergroup difference in PFS and the median PFS (95% confidence interval) values of the Pem and Pem + Bev groups were 5.4 (3.0-7.4) and 5.5 (3.6-9.9) months, respectively (p = 0.66). The response rate was significantly higher in the Pem + Bev group (15% vs. 55%, p = 0.0146), and there was no significant difference in OS (median: 16.0 vs. 16.4 months, p = 0.58). Grade 3 and 4 leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were seen in 10 and 30, 20 and 55, and 5 and 5 cases, respectively. Drug costs were higher in the Pem + Bev group (median: 1,522,008 vs. 3,368,428 JPY, p = 0.01). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding Bev to Pem did not result in improved survival in the elderly NSqNSCLC patients. Compared with Pem + Bev, Pem monotherapy had similar effects on survival, a more favorable toxicity profile, and was more cost-effective in elderly NSqNSCLC patients. Pem monotherapy might be one of the optional regimen for NSqNSCLC patients aged ≥75 years.

摘要

目的

为了评估疗效和安全性,我们开展了一项培美曲塞(Pem)对比培美曲塞联合贝伐珠单抗(Bev)用于治疗老年非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(NSqNSCLC)患者的随机 II 期研究。

患者和方法

入选标准为:NSqNSCLC、未经治疗、III 期/IV 期疾病或术后复发、年龄≥75 岁、体力状态(PS):0-1 分、骨髓功能充足。患者按 1:1 比例随机分配接受培美曲塞或培美曲塞联合贝伐珠单抗治疗。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)。次要终点为缓解率、总生存期(OS)、毒性和成本效益。

结果

共纳入 41 例患者,40 例(每组 20 例)可评估。患者特征如下:男/女=23/17;中位年龄(范围)=78(75-83)岁;III 期/IV 期/术后复发=1/30/9;PS 0/1=11/29。所有病例均为腺癌。PFS 无显著组间差异,培美曲塞组和培美曲塞联合贝伐珠单抗组中位 PFS(95%置信区间)值分别为 5.4(3.0-7.4)和 5.5(3.6-9.9)个月(p=0.66)。培美曲塞联合贝伐珠单抗组的缓解率显著更高(15% vs. 55%,p=0.0146),OS 无显著差异(中位:16.0 vs. 16.4 个月,p=0.58)。3 级和 4 级白细胞减少、中性粒细胞减少和血小板减少分别见于 10 例和 30 例、20 例和 55 例、5 例和 5 例。培美曲塞联合贝伐珠单抗组药物费用较高(中位:1522008 日元 vs. 3368428 日元,p=0.01)。无治疗相关死亡。

结论

在老年 NSqNSCLC 患者中,培美曲塞联合贝伐珠单抗并未改善生存。与培美曲塞联合贝伐珠单抗相比,培美曲塞单药治疗在老年 NSqNSCLC 患者中的生存获益相似,毒性谱更有利,且更具成本效益。培美曲塞单药治疗可能是≥75 岁 NSqNSCLC 患者的可选方案之一。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验