Suppr超能文献

Comparison of high-frequency chest wall compression with conventional mechanical ventilation in cats.

作者信息

Hayek Z, Ryan C A, Eyal F, Jones R, Armengol J, King E G, Finer N N

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1987 Jul;15(7):676-81. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198707000-00010.

Abstract

Six anesthetized paralyzed cats with normal lungs were ventilated by high-frequency chest wall compression (HFCWC) at 5 Hz using a single-chamber circumferential cuff enclosing the thorax from the axillae to the xiphisternum. PaCO2 during HFCWC + PEEP (3 cm H2O) was significantly (p less than .0005) lower compared with conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV). End-expiratory lung volume (VL) during HFCWC + PEEP was significantly (p less than .001) lower than VL during CMV + PEEP but was higher than VL during CMV without PEEP. After the cats' lungs were stiffened by repeated saline lavage, CMV + PEEP at a mean airway pressure (Paw) of 10 cm H2O was compared with HFCWC + continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) at an equal or lower Paw. A significant decrease in PaCO2 (p less than .02) during HFCWC occurred but no significant differences were observed in PaO2, VL, or compliance. Arterial BP and cardiac output were similar between CMV + PEEP and HFCWC + CPAP. In cats with normal lungs, VL can be maintained by applying CPAP during HFCWC, and in those with injured lungs, HFCWC + CPAP produces comparable gas exchange at a Paw equal to or lower than that used during CMV + PEEP.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验