Suppr超能文献

医疗入院预填表能否提高文件记录的完整性?一项多中心观察性研究。

Do medical admission pro formas -improve the completeness of documentation? A multisite observational study.

作者信息

Smallwood Nicholas, Russell Joe, Forbes-Pyman Rachel, Coates Anna

机构信息

Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, East Surrey Hospital, Redhill, UK.

University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Future Healthc J. 2018 Jun;5(2):121-125. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.5-2-121.

Abstract

There is little evidence as to whether clerking pro formas are more or less effective than continuation sheets for the acute medical admission clerking process. This two site audit aimed to assess the effect of introducing clerking pro formas on the completeness of documentation in 32 areas. Data were collected at two sites both pre- and post-introduction of two different clerking pro formas, and a two-tailed z-test used to assess the significance in changes in documentation at each individual site and combined across both sites. Site one showed improvements in 23/32 areas, with 7/32 (21.9%) being significant; three areas saw a decline and 1/32 showed a statistically significant decline. Site two showed improvement across 25/32 sites with 19 (59.4%) being significant; there were no areas showing less complete documentation. Cross-site analysis showed improvements in 30/32 categories, with 15 (46.9%) being significant; one area showed a non-significant decline. The greatest percentage improvement was seen in documentation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation / escalation decisions - an important consideration in this clinically unstable population. The introduction of clerking pro formas across two sites improved the completeness of documentation in a number of areas. This data supports the widespread introduction of clerking pro formas as a tool to improve the completeness of admission documentation.

摘要

关于在急性内科入院记录过程中,记录模板与续页相比效果如何,几乎没有证据。这项双中心审计旨在评估引入记录模板对32个领域文档完整性的影响。在引入两种不同记录模板之前和之后,在两个中心收集数据,并使用双侧z检验来评估每个中心以及两个中心合并后文档变化的显著性。第一个中心在32个领域中的23个有改善,其中7个(21.9%)有显著改善;3个领域出现下降,1个(32分之一)有统计学显著下降。第二个中心在32个领域中的25个有改善,其中19个(59.4%)有显著改善;没有领域显示文档完整性降低。跨中心分析显示,32个类别中的30个有改善,其中15个(46.9%)有显著改善;1个领域有非显著下降。在心肺复苏/升级决策记录方面改善百分比最大——这在这个临床不稳定人群中是一个重要考量因素。在两个中心引入记录模板改善了多个领域的文档完整性。这些数据支持广泛引入记录模板作为提高入院文档完整性的工具。

相似文献

3
Does an admission booklet improve patient safety?入院手册能否提高患者安全性?
J Ment Health. 2011 Oct;20(5):438-44. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2011.577117. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
10
The surgical admissions proforma: Does it make a difference?手术入院检查表:它有作用吗?
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2015 Feb 7;4(1):53-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2015.01.004. eCollection 2015 Mar.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Improving inpatient care with the introduction of a hip fracture pathway.通过引入髋部骨折治疗路径改善住院护理。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015 Feb 11;4(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u204075.w2786. eCollection 2015.
4
The surgical admissions proforma: Does it make a difference?手术入院检查表:它有作用吗?
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2015 Feb 7;4(1):53-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2015.01.004. eCollection 2015 Mar.
5
Does an admission booklet improve patient safety?入院手册能否提高患者安全性?
J Ment Health. 2011 Oct;20(5):438-44. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2011.577117. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
6
Quality of patient record keeping: an indicator of the quality of care?患者病历记录质量:护理质量的指标?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Apr;20(4):314-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2009.038976. Epub 2011 Feb 8.
7
Medical malpractice matters: medical record M & Ms.医疗事故问题:病历中的不良事件
J Surg Educ. 2009 Mar-Apr;66(2):113-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2008.12.002.
8
Medical records and record-keeping standards.医疗记录与记录保存标准。
Clin Med (Lond). 2007 Aug;7(4):328-31. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.7-4-328.
10
Standards in medical record keeping.病历记录标准。
Clin Med (Lond). 2003 Jul-Aug;3(4):329-32. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.3-4-329.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验