• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

病历记录标准。

Standards in medical record keeping.

作者信息

Mann Robin, Williams John

机构信息

Health Informatics Unit, Royal College of Physicians, London.

出版信息

Clin Med (Lond). 2003 Jul-Aug;3(4):329-32. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.3-4-329.

DOI:10.7861/clinmedicine.3-4-329
PMID:12938746
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5351947/
Abstract

Medical records serve many functions but their primary purpose is to support patient care. The RCP Health Informatics Unit (HIU) has found variability in the quality of records and discharge summaries in England and Wales. There is currently a major drive to computerise medical records across the NHS, but without improvement in the quality of paper records the full benefits of computerisation are unlikely to be realised. The onus for improving records lies with individual health professionals. Structuring the record can bring direct benefits to patients by improving patient outcomes and doctors' performance. The HIU has reviewed the literature and is developing evidence-based standards for record keeping including the structure of the record. The first draft of these standards has been released for consultation purposes. This article is the first of a series that will describe the standards, and the evidence behind them.

摘要

医疗记录有多种功能,但其主要目的是支持患者护理。英国皇家内科医师学会健康信息学部门(HIU)发现,英格兰和威尔士的病历及出院小结质量存在差异。目前,整个英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)正大力推动医疗记录电子化,但如果纸质记录的质量得不到改善,电子化带来的全部益处就不太可能实现。改善记录的责任在于个体医疗专业人员。构建记录结构可通过改善患者治疗效果和医生表现直接造福患者。HIU已查阅文献,并正在制定基于证据的记录保存标准,包括记录结构。这些标准的初稿已发布以供咨询。本文是系列文章中的第一篇,将介绍这些标准及其背后的证据。

相似文献

1
Standards in medical record keeping.病历记录标准。
Clin Med (Lond). 2003 Jul-Aug;3(4):329-32. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.3-4-329.
2
Medical records.医疗记录。
Clin Med (Lond). 2003 Jul-Aug;3(4):301-2. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.3-4-301.
3
An audit of basic record keeping standards: lessons learnt from the Royal College of Physicians.基本记录保存标准审计:从皇家内科医师学院汲取的经验教训
Med Sci Law. 2008 Apr;48(2):155-8. doi: 10.1258/rsmmsl.48.2.155.
4
Physician involvement enhances coding accuracy to ensure national standards: an initiative to improve awareness among new junior trainees.医生的参与提高编码准确性以确保国家标准:一项提高新初级实习生认识的倡议。
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2011 Jun;41(2):106-8. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2011.220.
5
Surgical hospital audit of record keeping (SHARK)--a new audit tool for the improvement in surgical record keeping.手术医院病历记录审核(SHARK)——一种改进手术病历记录的新审核工具。
J Surg Educ. 2013 May-Jun;70(3):373-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.12.003.
6
Compliance with the RCOG's guidelines on medical record keeping in female sterilisation: a complete audit cycle.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Jan;27(1):48-50. doi: 10.1080/01443610601056277.
7
A look back at over 50 years of NHS record keeping.回顾国民健康服务体系50多年的记录保存情况。
Health Libr Rev. 1998 Dec;15(4):280-2. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2532.1998.15402792.x.
8
An audit of the quality of deployed DMICP records on Operation HERRICK 14.
J R Army Med Corps. 2012 Sep;158(3):213-6. doi: 10.1136/jramc-158-03-13.
9
Setting the records straight--a prospective audit of the quality of case notes in a surgical department.澄清事实——对外科科室病例记录质量的前瞻性审计
S Afr J Surg. 2007 Aug;45(3):92, 94-5.
10
Royal College of Physicians medical record keeping standards audit.皇家内科医学院病历记录标准审核
Clin Med (Lond). 2010 Oct;10(5):523. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.10-5-523.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences and insights of thalassaemia carriers from an indigenous community in Sabah, Malaysia.马来西亚沙巴州一个原住民社区地中海贫血携带者的经历与见解。
J Community Genet. 2025 May 14. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00800-8.
2
Improving Pediatric Surgical Follow-Up Documentation: A Prospective Clinical Audit in the Department of Pediatric Surgery at National Ribat University Hospital, Sudan.改善儿科手术随访记录:苏丹国立里巴特大学医院儿科外科的一项前瞻性临床审计
Cureus. 2025 Apr 8;17(4):e81888. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81888. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Lost in transcription - how accurately are we documenting the surgical ward round?记录缺失——我们对外科病房查房的记录有多准确?
ANZ J Surg. 2025 May;95(5):1005-1010. doi: 10.1111/ans.70109. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
4
Application of large language models in clinical record correction: a comprehensive study on various retraining methods.大语言模型在临床记录校正中的应用:关于各种再训练方法的综合研究
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Feb 1;32(2):341-348. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae302.
5
Value of an orthopaedic admission proforma.骨科入院表单的价值。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Sep 19;13(3):e002159. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002159.
6
New take on the post-take ward round: a quality improvement project undertaken in a district general hospital.新视角下的术后查房:在一家地区综合医院开展的一项质量改进项目。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Oct;11(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001923.
7
Maintaining a medical institution in a context of materiality change: Lessons from a Canadian university hospital.在物质变化的背景下维持医疗机构:来自加拿大大学医院的经验教训。
Health (London). 2023 Nov;27(6):1135-1154. doi: 10.1177/13634593221109680. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
8
Can Checklists Solve Our Ward Round Woes? A Systematic Review.清单能否解决我们的病房查房难题?系统评价。
World J Surg. 2022 Oct;46(10):2355-2364. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06635-5. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
9
Initiative to improve quality of paediatric ward-round documentation by application of 'SOAP' format.应用“SOAP”格式提高儿科病房查房记录质量的举措。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 May;11(Suppl 1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001472.
10
How to assure the quality of clinical records? A 7-year experience in a large academic hospital.如何保证病历质量?一家大型教学医院 7 年的经验。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 9;16(12):e0261018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261018. eCollection 2021.