Polianski Igor J
Institut für Geschichte, Theorie und Ethik der Medizin, Universität Ulm, Parkstraße 11, 89073, Ulm, Deutschland.
Nervenarzt. 2020 Mar;91(3):261-267. doi: 10.1007/s00115-019-0726-2.
The Allied Forces policy of denazification and demilitarization during the early post-war period has had a lasting impact on medical disciplinary cultures in all occupation zones of Germany. By means of various control procedures, the conceptuality and linguistic design, the style and normative horizon of medical literature were reconstituted. This article examines this change using the example of psychiatry and neurology in the Soviet Occupation Zone. It deals with the neurological psychiatric textbook as a central medium of disciplinary communication and reconstructs how the knowledge in this field was processed and prepared in complex negotiation processes between authors, publishers and censors. The focus is on institutionalized filters of limited production of discourses and thus the archival holdings of censorship authorities, which have not yet been evaluated. The evaluation results are presented here with a focus on psychiatry and neurology and illustrated with selected case studies.
战后初期盟军的去纳粹化和非军事化政策对德国所有占领区的医学学科文化产生了持久影响。通过各种控制程序，医学文献的概念性、语言设计、风格和规范视野得以重构。本文以苏联占领区的精神病学和神经病学为例，考察了这一变化。它将神经精神病学教科书视为学科交流的核心媒介，并重构了该领域的知识在作者、出版商和审查人员之间复杂的协商过程中是如何被处理和准备的。重点关注话语生产受限的制度化过滤器，即审查当局的档案资料，这些资料尚未得到评估。这里呈现的评估结果以精神病学和神经病学为重点，并通过选定的案例研究加以说明。
