Roelcke Volker
Institut für Geschichte der Medizin, Universität Giessen, Giessen.
Acta Hist Leopoldina. 2007(48):173-90.
The article reconstructs the emergence of institutionalized research programs in the field of psychiatric genetics. It focuses on the first institutions in this field in Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States: the Genealogisch-Demographische Abteilung (GDA) at the Deutsche Forschungsanstalt für Psychiatrie in Munich founded in 1917/18; the Program (later: Department) of Medical Genetics at the New York State Psychiatric Institute, associated with Columbia University, and founded in 1936; and the Psychiatric Genetics Unit at the Institute of Psychiatry in London, founded in 1959. The early protagonists which today are considered the founding-fathers of this field in Britain and the USA, Eliot Slater and Franz Kallmann, both had been research fellows at the Munich GDA in the mid-1930s which at that time was directed by Ernst Rüdin. Rüdin was perceived as the leading personality in the field internationally; at the same time, he was one of the protagonists of the German movement of eugenics and racial hygiene, and after the Nazi-takeover in 1933 closely co-operated with the regime in regard to health and racial policies. The contribution documents that not only Rüdin, but also Kallmann and Slater throughout their career in medical genetics until the 1960s were motivated by eugenic ideas, and engaged in eugenic organisations, - however, with different consequences, and in different political contexts. It is further argued that these eugenic motivations had repercussions on the topics and questions pursued in the protagonists' genetic research.
本文重构了精神病遗传学领域制度化研究项目的兴起过程。它聚焦于德国、英国和美国该领域的首批机构:1917/18年在慕尼黑成立的德意志精神病学研究所家谱 - 人口统计学部(GDA);1936年成立的与哥伦比亚大学相关的纽约州精神病研究所医学遗传学项目(后为系);以及1959年成立的伦敦精神病学研究所精神病遗传学小组。如今被视为英美两国该领域创始人的早期倡导者埃利奥特·斯莱特和弗朗茨·卡尔曼,在20世纪30年代中期都曾是慕尼黑GDA的研究员,当时该部门由恩斯特·吕丁领导。吕丁被视为国际上该领域的领军人物;与此同时,他是德国优生学和种族卫生运动的倡导者之一,在1933年纳粹掌权后,在健康和种族政策方面与政权密切合作。该论文表明,不仅吕丁,而且卡尔曼和斯莱特在20世纪60年代之前整个医学遗传学职业生涯中都受到优生学思想的影响,并参与了优生学组织——然而,其后果不同,且处于不同的政治背景下。进一步的观点认为,这些优生学动机对倡导者们基因研究中所探讨的主题和问题产生了影响。