Humans and the Microbiome Program, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, 661 University Avenue, Suite 505, Toronto, ON, M5G 1Z8, Canada.
Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, 1810 Hinman Avenue, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
Bioessays. 2019 Oct;41(10):e1900007. doi: 10.1002/bies.201900007. Epub 2019 May 17.
This essay, written by a biologist, a microbial ecologist, a biological anthropologist, and an anthropologist-historian, examines tensions and translations in microbiome research on animals in the laboratory and field. The authors trace how research questions and findings in the laboratory are extrapolated into the field and vice versa, and the shifting evidentiary standards that these research settings require. Showing how complexities of microbiomes challenge traditional standards of causation, the authors contend that these challenges require new approaches to inferences used in ecology, anthropology, and history. As social scientists incorporate investigations of microbial life into their human studies, microbiome researchers venture into field settings to develop mechanistic understandings about the functions of complex microbial communities. These efforts generate new possibilities for cross-fertilizations and inference frameworks to interpret microbiome findings. Microbiome research should integrate multiple scales, levels of variability, and other disciplinary approaches to tackle questions spanning conditions from the laboratory to the field.
这篇由一位生物学家、一位微生物生态学家、一位生物人类学家和一位人类史学家共同撰写的文章,考察了实验室和实地动物微生物组研究中的紧张关系和转化。作者追溯了实验室中的研究问题和发现如何被推断到实地,反之亦然,以及这些研究环境所需的不断变化的证据标准。通过展示微生物组的复杂性如何挑战因果关系的传统标准,作者认为,这些挑战需要在生态学、人类学和历史学中采用新的推论方法。随着社会科学家将微生物生命的研究纳入其人类研究,微生物组研究人员涉足实地环境,以对复杂微生物群落的功能形成机制理解。这些努力为解释微生物组研究结果的交叉授粉和推理框架提供了新的可能性。微生物组研究应该整合多个尺度、变异性水平和其他学科方法,以解决从实验室到实地的各种条件下的问题。