Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Autism Res. 2019 Sep;12(9):1367-1375. doi: 10.1002/aur.2126. Epub 2019 May 17.
There has been increasing attention to the assessment of minimally verbal (MV) children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Previous research has begun to examine the relationship between verbal abilities and emotional and behavioral problems (EBP). The current study compared parent-reported EBP in children of differing language levels on two instruments commonly used in ASD research and clinical practice, the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC). The study consisted of 1,937 6-18 years old children with ASD from the Simons Simplex Collection. Children were divided into three language groups, by ADOS module (Module 1 = MV, 2 = phrase speech (PS), and 3 = verbally fluent (VF)) and then compared on CBCL and ABC subscales. The ABC and CBCL showed different patterns of elevations across the language groups. MV children were reported to have more impairment than VF children on the ABC irritability, lethargy, and hyperactivity scales. Children with less language (MV and PS) exhibited less impairment on the CBCL internalizing domain than VF children, but did not differ on the externalizing domain. Post hoc comparisons showed that internalizing differences were driven by fewer children with less language exhibiting clinically elevated anxious/depressed scores compared to VF children. The present study underscores the significance of considering language when assessing EBP. Results have implications for the psychiatric screening of children with ASD, particularly those with language impairments. Researchers should exercise caution when applying EBP instruments designed for use with different populations and purposes to broad samples of children. Autism Res 2019, 12: 1367-1375. © 2019 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. LAY SUMMARY: Some emotional and behavioral problem (EBP) scales include items that may be inappropriate for children with ASD and limited language. The present study found that there was a tendency for children with language impairment to have lower internalizing scores on the Child Behavior Checklist, but higher scores lethargy and irritability scores on the Aberrant Behavior Checklist, relative to verbally fluent children. This suggests that each of these instruments may underestimate EBPs in certain subsets of children.
越来越多的人关注自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的极轻度言语(MV)儿童的评估。先前的研究已经开始研究言语能力与情绪和行为问题(EBP)之间的关系。本研究比较了在 ASD 研究和临床实践中常用的两种工具(儿童行为检查表(CBCL)和异常行为检查表(ABC))上具有不同语言水平的儿童的父母报告的 EBP。该研究包括来自西蒙斯单纯性收藏的 1937 名 6-18 岁的 ASD 儿童。根据 ADOS 模块(模块 1 = MV,2 =短语言语(PS)和 3 =言语流利(VF)),将儿童分为三组,然后比较 CBCL 和 ABC 分量表。ABC 和 CBCL 显示出不同的语言组升高模式。与 VF 儿童相比,MV 儿童在 ABC 易激惹,嗜睡和多动量表上报告的损伤更多。语言较少的儿童(MV 和 PS)在 CBCL 内部化领域的损伤程度低于 VF 儿童,但在外化领域没有差异。事后比较表明,内部化差异是由于语言较少的儿童中较少的儿童表现出与 VF 儿童相比临床升高的焦虑/抑郁评分所致。本研究强调了在评估 EBP 时考虑语言的重要性。研究结果对 ASD 儿童的精神科筛查具有重要意义,尤其是那些语言障碍的儿童。研究人员在将专为不同人群和目的而设计的 EBP 工具应用于广泛的儿童样本时应谨慎。自闭症研究 2019,12:1367-1375。 © 2019 自闭症国际研究协会,Wiley 期刊,公司。
一些情绪和行为问题(EBP)量表包括可能不适合 ASD 且语言有限的儿童的项目。本研究发现,与言语流利的儿童相比,语言障碍儿童的儿童行为检查表的内化评分较低,但在异常行为检查表上的嗜睡和易激惹评分较高。这表明,这些工具中的每一种都可能低估了某些儿童亚群的 EBP。