Ohrtman Emily A, Zaninotto Ana Luiza, Carvalho Sandra, Shie Vivian L, Leite Jorge, Ianni Corinne Rose, Kazis Lewis E, Zafonte Ross, Ryan Colleen M, Schneider Jeffrey C, Fregni Felipe
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Boston-Harvard Burn Injury Model System, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Burn Care Res. 2019 Oct 16;40(6):792-795. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irz084.
Long-term trials are key to understanding chronic symptoms such as pain and itch. However, challenges such as high attrition rates and poor recruitment are common when conducting research. The aim of this work was to explore these issues within a long-term randomized control trial using transcranial direct current stimulation to treat pain and itch. This parallel double blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial was comprised of 15 transcranial direct current stimulation visits and 7 follow-up visits. Participants were over the age of 18, had a burn injury that occurred at least 3 weeks before enrollment, and reported having pain and/or itch that was moderate to severe in intensity. A total of 31 subjects were randomized into either an active or sham transcranial direct current stimulation groups. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, race, education, baseline depression, or anxiety. The median dropout time was at visit 19 (visit 16 [SE = 1.98] for the sham group and visit 19 [SE = 1.98] for the active group). Analysis showed no differences in the dropout rate between groups [χ2(1) = 0.003, P = .954]. The dropout rate was 46.7% for the sham group and 43.8% for the active group. Overall, 45.2% of the subjects dropped out of the trial. Long-term clinical trials are an essential part of evaluating interventions for symptoms such as chronic pain and itch. However, as seen in this trial, long-term studies in the burn population often face recruitment and adherence challenges.
长期试验是了解疼痛和瘙痒等慢性症状的关键。然而,在开展研究时,诸如高损耗率和招募困难等挑战很常见。这项工作的目的是在一项使用经颅直流电刺激治疗疼痛和瘙痒的长期随机对照试验中探讨这些问题。这项平行双盲、安慰剂对照的随机试验包括15次经颅直流电刺激就诊和7次随访。参与者年龄在18岁以上,烧伤发生在入组前至少3周,且报告有中度至重度的疼痛和/或瘙痒。共有31名受试者被随机分为经颅直流电刺激治疗组或假刺激组。两组在年龄、种族、教育程度、基线抑郁或焦虑方面无显著差异。中位退出时间为第19次就诊(假刺激组为第16次就诊[标准误=1.98],治疗组为第19次就诊[标准误=1.98])。分析显示两组间退出率无差异[χ2(1)=0.003,P=0.954]。假刺激组退出率为46.7%,治疗组为43.8%。总体而言,45.2%的受试者退出了试验。长期临床试验是评估慢性疼痛和瘙痒等症状干预措施的重要组成部分。然而,正如本试验所示,烧伤人群的长期研究往往面临招募和依从性挑战。