Suppr超能文献

道德地位的生物联系与生物学解释

Biological Ties and Biological Accounts of Moral Status.

作者信息

Monaghan Jake

机构信息

University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Med Philos. 2019 May 18;44(3):355-377. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhz005.

Abstract

Speciesist or biological accounts of moral status can be defended by showing that all members of Homo sapiens have a moral status conferring property. In this article, I argue that the most promising defense locates the moral status conferring property in the relational property of being biologically tied to other humans. This requires that biological ties ground moral obligations. I consider and reject the best defenses of that premise. Thus, we are left with compelling evidence that biological ties and membership in a biological category like "species" ground neither moral obligations nor moral status. Because it is crucial to account for the moral significance of family bonds, I conclude by describing the sense in which biological ties matter morally.

摘要

通过表明智人的所有成员都拥有赋予道德地位的属性,可以捍卫物种主义或关于道德地位的生物学解释。在本文中,我认为最有前景的辩护是将赋予道德地位的属性定位在与其他人类有生物学联系的关系属性中。这要求生物学联系奠定道德义务。我考虑并驳斥了该前提的最佳辩护。因此,我们得到了令人信服的证据,即生物学联系和诸如“物种”这样的生物类别中的成员身份既不能奠定道德义务,也不能奠定道德地位。由于解释家庭关系的道德意义至关重要,我最后描述了生物学联系在道德上重要的意义。

相似文献

3
To what do we have moral obligations and why? I.我们对什么负有道德义务,为什么?一、
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Jun 1;290(6482):1646-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6482.1646.
6
To what do we have moral obligations and why? II.我们对什么负有道德义务,为什么?二。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Jun 8;290(6483):1734-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6483.1734.
8
Genetic ties: are they morally binding?基因联系:它们在道德上具有约束力吗?
Bioethics. 2006 Apr;20(2):64-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00478.x.
9
Rethinking the moral permissibility of gamete donation.重新思考配子捐赠的道德可允许性。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2014 Dec;35(6):421-40. doi: 10.1007/s11017-014-9314-4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验