• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国妊娠期过敏反应:使用全国常规收集数据的危险因素和时间趋势。

Anaphylaxis in Pregnancy in the United States: Risk Factors and Temporal Trends Using National Routinely Collected Data.

机构信息

National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom.

National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Nov-Dec;7(8):2606-2612.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.04.047. Epub 2019 May 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2019.04.047
PMID:31102701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6848914/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anaphylaxis in pregnancy is an understudied, rare, and severe complication of pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the incidence and temporal trends, and to identify potential risk factors for anaphylaxis-related hospitalizations while pregnant in the United States.

METHODS

All hospitalizations while pregnant and any anaphylactic reactions were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes from the National Inpatient Sample, United States, over the period 2004 to 2014. Annual incidence rates of anaphylaxis during pregnancy were calculated. Logistic regression models assessed risk factors for anaphylaxis during pregnancy, presented as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs.

RESULTS

During the period 2004 to 2014, the incidence of anaphylaxis during pregnancy was 3.8 (95% CI, 3.4-4.2) per 100,000 hospitalizations while pregnant. The incidence did not statistically differ during the period 2004 to 2014. After adjustment, there were 3 factors that increased the odds of anaphylaxis during pregnancy: cesarean delivery (adjusted OR [aOR], 4.19; 95% CI, 3.28-5.35) compared with noncesarean delivery; history of an allergic reaction (aOR, 4.05; 95% CI, 2.64-6.23) compared with no history; and a black race (aOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.15-2.15) and other race (aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.08-2.63) compared with white race.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite increased rates of cesarean delivery in the United States and consequent drug administration, there was no evidence of an increasing trend in anaphylaxis. Cesarean delivery and history of an allergic reaction allow the identification of women at risk of anaphylaxis. Not all women had clear risk factors, and preparations should always be in place to ensure timely management if this uncommon event occurs.

摘要

背景

妊娠期间的过敏反应是一种研究较少、罕见且严重的妊娠并发症。

目的

描述美国妊娠期间过敏反应相关住院的发生率和时间趋势,并确定其潜在的危险因素。

方法

利用美国国家住院患者样本中国际疾病分类,第九版临床修订版代码,于 2004 年至 2014 年期间确定妊娠期间所有住院和任何过敏反应的情况。计算妊娠期间过敏反应的年发生率。采用逻辑回归模型评估妊娠期间过敏反应的危险因素,以比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)表示。

结果

2004 年至 2014 年期间,妊娠期间过敏反应的发生率为每 100000 例妊娠住院患者 3.8 例(95%CI,3.4-4.2)。该发生率在 2004 年至 2014 年期间无统计学差异。调整后,有 3 个因素增加了妊娠期间过敏反应的可能性:与非剖宫产相比,剖宫产(调整后 OR [aOR],4.19;95%CI,3.28-5.35);与无过敏史相比,有过敏史(aOR,4.05;95%CI,2.64-6.23);与白种人相比,黑种人(aOR,1.57;95%CI,1.15-2.15)和其他种族(aOR,1.69;95%CI,1.08-2.63)。

结论

尽管美国剖宫产率增加,相应的药物使用增加,但没有证据表明过敏反应呈上升趋势。剖宫产和过敏史可以识别有过敏反应风险的女性。并非所有女性都有明确的危险因素,如果发生这种罕见的事件,应始终做好及时管理的准备。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bd3/6848914/d825a5f738d7/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bd3/6848914/f1cb30b63726/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bd3/6848914/d825a5f738d7/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bd3/6848914/f1cb30b63726/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bd3/6848914/d825a5f738d7/fx1.jpg

相似文献

1
Anaphylaxis in Pregnancy in the United States: Risk Factors and Temporal Trends Using National Routinely Collected Data.美国妊娠期过敏反应:使用全国常规收集数据的危险因素和时间趋势。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Nov-Dec;7(8):2606-2612.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.04.047. Epub 2019 May 16.
2
Impact of the ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM transition on the incidence of severe maternal morbidity among delivery hospitalizations in the United States.从国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本(ICD - 9 - CM)转换到国际疾病分类第十版临床修订本(ICD - 10 - CM)对美国分娩住院期间严重孕产妇发病率的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):422.e1-422.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.03.036. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
3
Trends in and Maternal Outcomes of Delivery Hospitalizations of Patients With an Asthma Diagnosis.哮喘患者分娩住院的趋势及母婴结局。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jan 1;139(1):52-62. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004635.
4
Trends in Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations for Acute Allergic Reactions and Anaphylaxis Among US Older Adults: 2006-2014.美国老年人急性过敏反应和过敏症急诊就诊和住院趋势:2006-2014 年。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Jul;9(7):2831-2843.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.03.032. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
5
Epidemiology and trends of anaphylaxis in the United States, 2004-2016.美国 2004-2016 年过敏反应的流行病学和趋势。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019 Jun;9(6):607-614. doi: 10.1002/alr.22293. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
6
Nationwide Survey of Hospitalization Due to Pediatric Food-Induced Anaphylaxis in the United States.美国儿童食物诱导性过敏反应住院情况的全国性调查。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Nov;35(11):769-773. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001543.
7
Adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes complicated by psychosis among pregnant women in the United States.美国孕妇并发精神病导致的不良产科和新生儿结局。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 2;18(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1750-0.
8
Trends in hospitalizations related to anaphylaxis, angioedema, and urticaria in the United States.美国与过敏反应、血管性水肿和荨麻疹相关的住院治疗趋势。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019 Apr;122(4):401-406.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
9
Trends in Venous Thromboembolism and Associated Risk Factors During Delivery Hospitalizations From 2000 to 2018.2000 年至 2018 年分娩住院期间静脉血栓栓塞症及相关危险因素的变化趋势。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Feb 1;139(2):223-234. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004648.
10
Trends in US hospitalizations for anaphylaxis among infants and toddlers: 2006 to 2015.2006年至2015年美国婴幼儿过敏反应住院情况趋势
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Feb;126(2):168-174.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Two lives at stake: Obstetric anaphylactic shock resulting in acute respiratory distress syndrome - A case report.两条生命危在旦夕:产科过敏性休克导致急性呼吸窘迫综合征——一例病例报告
SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2022 Mar 16;10:2050313X221084843. doi: 10.1177/2050313X221084843. eCollection 2022.
2
State-of-the-Art on Biomarkers for Anaphylaxis in Obstetrics.产科过敏反应生物标志物的最新进展
Life (Basel). 2021 Aug 24;11(9):870. doi: 10.3390/life11090870.
3
Successful Management of a Suspected Case of Meperidine-Induced Anaphylaxis in Cesarean Delivery.

本文引用的文献

1
Non-IgE-mediated food hypersensitivity.非IgE介导的食物过敏反应
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2018 Sep 12;14(Suppl 2):56. doi: 10.1186/s13223-018-0285-2. eCollection 2018.
2
Anaesthesia, surgery, and life-threatening allergic reactions: epidemiology and clinical features of perioperative anaphylaxis in the 6th National Audit Project (NAP6).麻醉、手术和危及生命的过敏反应:第 6 次国家审计项目(NAP6)中围手术期过敏反应的流行病学和临床特征。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jul;121(1):159-171. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 May 21.
3
Births: Final Data for 2016.
剖宫产术中哌替啶诱发过敏反应疑似病例的成功处理
Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Aug 31;10(5):e104796. doi: 10.5812/aapm.104796. eCollection 2020 Oct.
4
Mepivacaine-induced anaphylactic shock in a pregnant woman undergoing combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a case report.剖宫产术联合脊麻-硬膜外麻醉时,甲哌卡因致一名孕妇发生过敏性休克:病例报告
JA Clin Rep. 2019 Dec 19;5(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s40981-019-0302-6.
5
Global Trends in Anaphylaxis Epidemiology and Clinical Implications.全球过敏反应流行病学趋势及其临床意义。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Apr;8(4):1169-1176. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.11.027. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
出生情况:2016年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018 Jan;67(1):1-55.
4
The incidence, characteristics, management and outcomes of anaphylaxis in pregnancy: a population-based descriptive study.妊娠期过敏反应的发生率、特征、管理和结局:一项基于人群的描述性研究。
BJOG. 2018 Jul;125(8):965-971. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15041. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
5
Fatal Anaphylaxis: Mortality Rate and Risk Factors.致命性过敏反应:死亡率和危险因素。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Sep-Oct;5(5):1169-1178. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.06.031.
6
Fatal anaphylaxis registries data support changes in the who anaphylaxis mortality coding rules.致命性过敏反应登记数据支持世界卫生组织过敏反应死亡率编码规则的变更。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Jan 13;12(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0554-4.
7
The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014.剖宫产率的上升趋势:全球、区域和国家估计:1990 - 2014年
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):e0148343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343. eCollection 2016.
8
No evidence for contraindications to the use of propofol in adults allergic to egg, soy or peanut†.没有证据表明在对鸡蛋、大豆或花生过敏的成年人中使用异丙酚有禁忌。
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jan;116(1):77-82. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev360.
9
Association between day of delivery and obstetric outcomes: observational study.分娩日期与产科结局之间的关联:观察性研究。
BMJ. 2015 Nov 24;351:h5774. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5774.
10
Anaesthesia-associated hypersensitivity reactions: seven years' data from a British bi-specialty clinic.麻醉相关过敏反应:来自英国双专科诊所的七年数据。
Anaesthesia. 2016 Jan;71(1):76-84. doi: 10.1111/anae.13273. Epub 2015 Nov 13.