• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球过敏反应流行病学趋势及其临床意义。

Global Trends in Anaphylaxis Epidemiology and Clinical Implications.

机构信息

Section of Inflammation, Repair & Development, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Apr;8(4):1169-1176. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.11.027. Epub 2019 Nov 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2019.11.027
PMID:31786255
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7152797/
Abstract

The true global scale of anaphylaxis remains elusive, because many episodes occur in the community without presentation to health care facilities, and most regions have not yet developed reliable systems with which to monitor severe allergic events. The most robust data sets currently available are based largely on hospital admissions, which are limited by inherent issues of misdiagnosis, misclassification, and generalizability. Despite this, there is convincing evidence of a global increase in rates of all-cause anaphylaxis, driven largely by medication- and food-related anaphylaxis. There is no evidence of parallel increases in global all-cause anaphylaxis mortality, with surprisingly similar estimates for case-fatality rates at approximately 0.5% to 1% of fatal outcomes for hospitalizations due to anaphylaxis across several regions. Studying regional patterns of anaphylaxis to certain triggers have provided valuable insights into susceptibility and sensitizing events: for example, the link between the mAb cetuximab and allergy to mammalian meat. Likewise, data from published fatality registers can identify potentially modifiable risk factors that can be used to inform clinical practice, such as prevention of delayed epinephrine administration, correct posturing during anaphylaxis, special attention to populations at risk (such as the elderly on multiple medications), and use of venom immunotherapy in individuals at risk of insect-related anaphylaxis.

摘要

过敏性反应的真实全球规模仍然难以捉摸,因为许多病例发生在社区,并未到医疗机构就诊,而且大多数地区尚未建立可靠的系统来监测严重过敏事件。目前可用的最可靠数据集主要基于住院数据,这些数据受到误诊、分类错误和普遍性的固有问题的限制。尽管如此,仍有令人信服的证据表明,所有原因的过敏性反应的全球发生率都在增加,主要是由药物和食物相关的过敏性反应驱动的。没有证据表明全球所有原因的过敏性反应死亡率也在平行增加,在几个地区因过敏性反应住院的死亡病例中,病死率的估计值惊人地相似,约为 0.5%至 1%。研究某些触发因素的区域性过敏性反应模式为易感性和致敏事件提供了有价值的见解:例如,单克隆抗体西妥昔单抗与哺乳动物肉类过敏之间的联系。同样,来自已发表的死亡率登记处的数据可以确定潜在的可改变的危险因素,这些危险因素可用于为临床实践提供信息,例如预防延迟给予肾上腺素、在过敏性反应期间正确保持姿势、特别关注高危人群(如服用多种药物的老年人),以及对有昆虫相关过敏性反应风险的个体使用毒液免疫疗法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a37/7152797/c5a2d2e3e3e1/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a37/7152797/b0df6acced3d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a37/7152797/b7e0eac275e9/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a37/7152797/aedaaa9aa80f/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a37/7152797/c5a2d2e3e3e1/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a37/7152797/b0df6acced3d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a37/7152797/b7e0eac275e9/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a37/7152797/aedaaa9aa80f/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a37/7152797/c5a2d2e3e3e1/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Global Trends in Anaphylaxis Epidemiology and Clinical Implications.全球过敏反应流行病学趋势及其临床意义。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Apr;8(4):1169-1176. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.11.027. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
2
Increase in anaphylaxis-related hospitalizations but no increase in fatalities: an analysis of United Kingdom national anaphylaxis data, 1992-2012.过敏性反应相关住院病例增加,但死亡病例未增加:对1992 - 2012年英国全国过敏性反应数据的分析
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Apr;135(4):956-963.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
3
Anaphylaxis.过敏反应。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Feb;125(2 Suppl 2):S161-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.12.981.
4
Overview of Allergy and Anaphylaxis.过敏和过敏反应概述。
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2023 Aug;43(3):435-451. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2022.10.009.
5
Fatal Anaphylaxis: Epidemiology and Risk Factors.致命性过敏反应:流行病学和危险因素。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2021 Apr 7;21(4):28. doi: 10.1007/s11882-021-01006-x.
6
Management of Anaphylaxis.过敏反应的管理。
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2022 Feb;42(1):65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2021.09.005.
7
[Food anaphylaxis].[食物过敏反应]
Rev Alerg Mex. 2023 Dec 31;70(4):300-305. doi: 10.29262/ram.v70i4.1341.
8
2012 Update: World Allergy Organization Guidelines for the assessment and management of anaphylaxis.2012 年更新:世界过敏组织关于过敏反应评估和管理的指南。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Aug;12(4):389-99. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e328355b7e4.
9
Anaphylaxis in children: Latest insights.儿童过敏反应:最新见解
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2025 May 1;46(3):168-184. doi: 10.2500/aap.2025.46.250005.
10
Clinical aspects of hymenoptera venom allergy and venom immunotherapy.膜翅目昆虫毒液过敏与毒液免疫疗法的临床方面
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Nov;51(6):244-258. doi: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.113.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing Adrenaline Administration in Anaphylaxis: Clinical Practice Considerations and Safety Insights.优化过敏性反应中的肾上腺素给药:临床实践考量与安全性见解
Clin Transl Allergy. 2025 Aug;15(8):e70085. doi: 10.1002/clt2.70085.
2
Recent Insights into the Epidemiology and Management of Anaphylaxis.过敏性反应流行病学与管理的最新见解
Balkan Med J. 2025 Sep 1;42(5):393-404. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2025.2025-5-86. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
3
Excipients in pharmaceuticals: mechanisms of hypersensitivity and the role of global pharmacovigilance.

本文引用的文献

1
Time to revisit the definition and clinical criteria for anaphylaxis?是时候重新审视过敏反应的定义和临床标准了?
World Allergy Organ J. 2019 Oct 31;12(10):100066. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2019.100066. eCollection 2019 Oct.
2
Anaphylaxis Management: Time to Re-Evaluate the Role of Corticosteroids.过敏反应的管理:是时候重新评估皮质类固醇的作用了。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Sep-Oct;7(7):2239-2240. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.07.005.
3
Changing the history of anaphylaxis mortality statistics through the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases-11.
药物中的辅料:超敏反应机制及全球药物警戒的作用
Saudi Pharm J. 2025 Jul 8;33(4):18. doi: 10.1007/s44446-025-00004-8.
4
Describing Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Course of Patients with Hereditary Alpha-tryptasemia: A Single-center Study.遗传性α-色胺血症患者的临床特征及治疗过程描述:一项单中心研究
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2025 Jun 14;68(1):57. doi: 10.1007/s12016-025-09063-0.
5
Probiotics in infants for prevention of allergic disease.婴儿使用益生菌预防过敏性疾病。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 13;6(6):CD006475. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006475.pub3.
6
Towards a common approach for managing food allergy and serious allergic reactions (anaphylaxis) at school. GALEN and EFA consensus statement.迈向学校食物过敏和严重过敏反应(过敏症)管理的通用方法。盖伦和欧洲过敏与临床免疫学会共识声明。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2025 Jan;15(1):e70013. doi: 10.1002/clt2.70013.
7
Re-evaluating treatment success in trials of peanut oral-immunotherapy: impact of different definitions on efficacy outcomes.重新评估花生口服免疫疗法试验中的治疗成功率:不同定义对疗效结果的影响。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2025 Jun 1;25(3):185-193. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000001077. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
8
Transparency, Reproducibility, and Accessibility of Clinical and Experimental Studies in Allergy (TRACES): Study design and protocol.过敏临床与实验研究的透明度、可重复性及可及性(TRACES):研究设计与方案
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2025 Mar 6;4(2):100447. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100447. eCollection 2025 May.
9
Early Origins of Asthma and Allergies: Clues From Studies in China.哮喘与过敏的早期起源:来自中国研究的线索
Clin Exp Allergy. 2025 Aug;55(8):611-624. doi: 10.1111/cea.70033. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
10
Clinical and Pathophysiological Tangles Between Allergy and Autoimmunity: Deconstructing an Old Dichotomic Paradigm.过敏与自身免疫之间的临床及病理生理纠葛:解构旧有的二分法范式
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2025 Feb 11;68(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s12016-024-09020-3.
通过世界卫生组织的《国际疾病分类-11》改变过敏反应死亡率统计数据的历史。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Sep;144(3):627-633. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.05.013. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
4
Biologics and anaphylaxis.生物制剂与过敏反应。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Oct;19(5):439-446. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000550.
5
Anaphylaxis in Pregnancy in the United States: Risk Factors and Temporal Trends Using National Routinely Collected Data.美国妊娠期过敏反应:使用全国常规收集数据的危险因素和时间趋势。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Nov-Dec;7(8):2606-2612.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.04.047. Epub 2019 May 16.
6
Alpha-Gal-containing biologics and anaphylaxis.含 Alpha-Gal 的生物制剂与过敏反应。
Allergol Int. 2019 Jul;68(3):296-300. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
7
Biomarkers in Human Anaphylaxis: A Critical Appraisal of Current Evidence and Perspectives.人类过敏反应中的生物标志物:对当前证据和观点的批判性评估。
Front Immunol. 2019 Apr 5;10:494. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00494. eCollection 2019.
8
Investigation into the α-Gal Syndrome: Characteristics of 261 Children and Adults Reporting Red Meat Allergy.α-半乳糖综合征研究:261 名报告红肉过敏的儿童和成人的特征。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Sep-Oct;7(7):2348-2358.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.03.031. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
9
Galactose α-1,3-galactose phenotypes: Lessons from various patient populations.半乳糖-α-1,3-半乳糖表型:来自不同患者群体的经验教训。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019 Jun;122(6):598-602. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.03.021. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
10
The global incidence and prevalence of anaphylaxis in children in the general population: A systematic review.全球一般人群中儿童过敏反应的发病率和患病率:系统评价。
Allergy. 2019 Jun;74(6):1063-1080. doi: 10.1111/all.13732. Epub 2019 Mar 6.