Sentara Heart Hospital, Division of Cardiology, Advanced Heart Failure Center and Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.
Department of Cardiology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, New York.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul 1;94(1):29-37. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28329. Epub 2019 May 19.
The outcome of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction has not appreciably changed in the last 30 years despite the development of various percutaneous mechanical circulatory support options. It is clear that there are varying degrees of cardiogenic shock but there is no robust classification scheme to categorize this disease state.
A multidisciplinary group of experts convened by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions was assembled to derive a proposed classification schema for cardiogenic shock. Representatives from cardiology (interventional, advanced heart failure, noninvasive), emergency medicine, critical care, and cardiac nursing all collaborated to develop the proposed schema.
A system describing stages of cardiogenic shock from A to E was developed. Stage A is "at risk" for cardiogenic shock, stage B is "beginning" shock, stage C is "classic" cardiogenic shock, stage D is "deteriorating", and E is "extremis". The difference between stages B and C is the presence of hypoperfusion which is present in stages C and higher. Stage D implies that the initial set of interventions chosen have not restored stability and adequate perfusion despite at least 30 minutes of observation and stage E is the patient in extremis, highly unstable, often with cardiovascular collapse.
This proposed classification system is simple, clinically applicable across the care spectrum from pre-hospital providers to intensive care staff but will require future validation studies to assess its utility and potential prognostic implications.
尽管出现了各种经皮机械循环支持选择,但心肌梗死后合并心源性休克的结局在过去 30 年中并没有明显改变。显然,心源性休克的程度不同,但没有稳健的分类方案来对这种疾病状态进行分类。
由心血管血管造影和介入学会召集的一个多学科专家组,旨在为心源性休克制定一个拟议的分类方案。心脏病学(介入、高级心力衰竭、非侵入性)、急诊医学、重症监护和心脏护理的代表都合作制定了拟议的方案。
开发了一个从 A 到 E 描述心源性休克各个阶段的系统。A 阶段是“有风险”发生心源性休克,B 阶段是“开始”休克,C 阶段是“典型”心源性休克,D 阶段是“恶化”,E 阶段是“危急”。B 阶段和 C 阶段的区别在于存在灌注不足,C 阶段及以上阶段都存在灌注不足。D 阶段意味着尽管已经观察了至少 30 分钟,但最初选择的一系列干预措施并未恢复稳定和充分的灌注,E 阶段是指患者处于危急状态,高度不稳定,经常伴有心血管衰竭。
这个拟议的分类系统简单,适用于从院前提供者到重症监护人员的整个护理范围,但需要进一步的验证研究来评估其效用和潜在的预后意义。