• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国心脏病学会(ACC)、美国心脏协会(AHA)、重症医学会(SCCM)和胸外科医师学会(STS)于 2019 年 4 月共同发布了心血管造影协会(SCAI)关于心源性休克分类的临床专家共识声明。

SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: This document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019.

机构信息

Sentara Heart Hospital, Division of Cardiology, Advanced Heart Failure Center and Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.

Department of Cardiology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, New York.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul 1;94(1):29-37. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28329. Epub 2019 May 19.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.28329
PMID:31104355
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The outcome of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction has not appreciably changed in the last 30 years despite the development of various percutaneous mechanical circulatory support options. It is clear that there are varying degrees of cardiogenic shock but there is no robust classification scheme to categorize this disease state.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary group of experts convened by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions was assembled to derive a proposed classification schema for cardiogenic shock. Representatives from cardiology (interventional, advanced heart failure, noninvasive), emergency medicine, critical care, and cardiac nursing all collaborated to develop the proposed schema.

RESULTS

A system describing stages of cardiogenic shock from A to E was developed. Stage A is "at risk" for cardiogenic shock, stage B is "beginning" shock, stage C is "classic" cardiogenic shock, stage D is "deteriorating", and E is "extremis". The difference between stages B and C is the presence of hypoperfusion which is present in stages C and higher. Stage D implies that the initial set of interventions chosen have not restored stability and adequate perfusion despite at least 30 minutes of observation and stage E is the patient in extremis, highly unstable, often with cardiovascular collapse.

CONCLUSION

This proposed classification system is simple, clinically applicable across the care spectrum from pre-hospital providers to intensive care staff but will require future validation studies to assess its utility and potential prognostic implications.

摘要

背景

尽管出现了各种经皮机械循环支持选择,但心肌梗死后合并心源性休克的结局在过去 30 年中并没有明显改变。显然,心源性休克的程度不同,但没有稳健的分类方案来对这种疾病状态进行分类。

方法

由心血管血管造影和介入学会召集的一个多学科专家组,旨在为心源性休克制定一个拟议的分类方案。心脏病学(介入、高级心力衰竭、非侵入性)、急诊医学、重症监护和心脏护理的代表都合作制定了拟议的方案。

结果

开发了一个从 A 到 E 描述心源性休克各个阶段的系统。A 阶段是“有风险”发生心源性休克,B 阶段是“开始”休克,C 阶段是“典型”心源性休克,D 阶段是“恶化”,E 阶段是“危急”。B 阶段和 C 阶段的区别在于存在灌注不足,C 阶段及以上阶段都存在灌注不足。D 阶段意味着尽管已经观察了至少 30 分钟,但最初选择的一系列干预措施并未恢复稳定和充分的灌注,E 阶段是指患者处于危急状态,高度不稳定,经常伴有心血管衰竭。

结论

这个拟议的分类系统简单,适用于从院前提供者到重症监护人员的整个护理范围,但需要进一步的验证研究来评估其效用和潜在的预后意义。

相似文献

1
SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: This document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019.美国心脏病学会(ACC)、美国心脏协会(AHA)、重症医学会(SCCM)和胸外科医师学会(STS)于 2019 年 4 月共同发布了心血管造影协会(SCAI)关于心源性休克分类的临床专家共识声明。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul 1;94(1):29-37. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28329. Epub 2019 May 19.
2
SCAI SHOCK Stage Classification Expert Consensus Update: A Review and Incorporation of Validation Studies: This statement was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), American Heart Association (AHA), European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care (ACVC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in December 2021.SCAI休克分期分类专家共识更新:验证研究的回顾与纳入:本声明于2021年12月获得美国心脏病学会(ACC)、美国急诊医师学会(ACEP)、美国心脏协会(AHA)、欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)急性心血管护理协会(ACVC)、国际心肺移植学会(ISHLT)、危重病医学会(SCCM)和胸外科医师学会(STS)的认可。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Mar 8;79(9):933-946. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.018. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
3
SCAI SHOCK Stage Classification Expert Consensus Update: A Review and Incorporation of Validation Studies: This statement was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), American Heart Association (AHA), European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care (ACVC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in December 2021.SCAI休克分期分类专家共识更新:验证研究的回顾与纳入:本声明于2021年12月得到美国心脏病学会(ACC)、美国急诊医师学会(ACEP)、美国心脏协会(AHA)、欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)急性心血管护理协会(ACVC)、国际心肺移植学会(ISHLT)、危重病医学学会(SCCM)和胸外科医师学会(STS)的认可。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Jan 30;1(1):100008. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2021.100008. eCollection 2022 Jan-Feb.
4
Cardiogenic Shock Classification to Predict Mortality in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.心原性休克分类预测心脏重症监护病房死亡率。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Oct 29;74(17):2117-2128. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.077. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
5
Mechanical circulatory support in patients with cardiogenic shock in intensive care units: A position paper of the "Unité de Soins Intensifs de Cardiologie" group of the French Society of Cardiology, endorsed by the "Groupe Athérome et Cardiologie Interventionnelle" of the French Society of Cardiology.重症监护病房心源休克患者的机械循环支持:法国心脏病学会“心血管重症监护”工作组的立场文件,得到法国心脏病学会“动脉粥样硬化与心血管介入”工作组的认可。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Oct;111(10):601-612. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
6
SCAI shock classification in acute myocardial infarction: Insights from the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative.急性心肌梗死中的 SCAI 休克分类:来自国家心源性休克倡议的见解。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;96(6):1137-1142. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29139. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
7
Prospective validation of the SCAI shock classification: Single center analysis.前瞻性验证 SCAI 休克分类:单中心分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Dec;96(7):1339-1347. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29319. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
8
Application of the SCAI classification in a cohort of patients with cardiogenic shock.SCAI分类在心源性休克患者队列中的应用。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Sep 1;96(3):E213-E219. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28707. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
9
ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/EACTS/HVS/SCA/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for the Treatment of Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Heart Valve Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.美国心脏病学会适当使用标准专家组、美国胸外科学会、美国心脏协会、美国超声心动图学会、欧洲心血管外科学会、心脏瓣膜学会、心血管麻醉师学会、心血管血管造影和介入学会、心血管计算机断层扫描学会、心血管磁共振学会和胸外科医师学会 2017 年严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者治疗的适当使用标准:报告
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018 Feb;31(2):117-147. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.10.020. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
10
The Range of Cardiogenic Shock Survival by Clinical Stage: Data From the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Registry.心源性休克临床分期的生存率范围:来自重症心脏病学试验网络登记处的数据。
Crit Care Med. 2021 Aug 1;49(8):1293-1302. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004948.

引用本文的文献

1
The Predictive Value of Clinical Signs to Identify Shock in Critically Ill Patients.临床体征对危重症患者休克的预测价值
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Sep 5;15(17):2252. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15172252.
2
Rethinking early risk stratification in heart failure-related cardiogenic shock.重新思考心力衰竭相关性心源性休克的早期风险分层
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025 Aug 29;60:101786. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101786. eCollection 2025 Oct.
3
Advances and controversies in acute decompensated heart failure treatment: beta-blocker roles, emerging devices, and future directions.
急性失代偿性心力衰竭治疗的进展与争议:β受体阻滞剂的作用、新型器械及未来方向
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Jul 16;87(9):5696-5719. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003592. eCollection 2025 Sep.
4
Systolic Blood Pressure and Microaxial Flow Pump-Associated Survival in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Post Hoc Analysis of the DanGer Shock Randomized Clinical Trial.收缩压与微轴流泵辅助梗死相关心源性休克患者生存率的关系:Danger Shock随机临床试验的事后分析
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Aug 30. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2025.3337.
5
Use of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation as a Support During Coronary Angioplasty in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: Safety and Feasibility.持续气道正压通气在急性心肌梗死患者冠状动脉成形术中作为支持手段的应用:安全性与可行性。
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 14;14(16):5756. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165756.
6
Prophylactic VA-ECMO During Complex High-Risk PCI: A Randomized Controlled Trial.复杂高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间的预防性体外膜肺氧合:一项随机对照试验。
JACC Adv. 2025 Aug 21;4(9):102095. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102095.
7
How we use critical care ultrasonography in the management of cardiogenic shock: a strategic game of chess in intensive care.我们如何在心源性休克的管理中使用重症超声检查:重症监护中的一场战略棋局。
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Aug 14. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-08048-z.
8
Deep learning predicts cardiac output from seismocardiographic signals in heart failure.深度学习可根据心力衰竭患者的心震图信号预测心输出量。
medRxiv. 2025 Jul 14:2025.07.11.25331386. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.11.25331386.
9
Practice Variation in Vasoactive Medication Use for Cardiogenic Shock Across ICU Subtypes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.不同重症监护病房亚型中心源性休克血管活性药物使用的实践差异:一项回顾性队列研究。
medRxiv. 2025 Jul 14:2025.07.11.25331408. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.11.25331408.
10
Impact of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation on Hemodynamics and Cardiac Mechanics: Insights From Pressure-Volume Loop Analysis.静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合对血流动力学和心脏力学的影响:压力-容积环分析的见解
Int J Heart Fail. 2025 Jul 7;7(3):125-138. doi: 10.36628/ijhf.2025.0005. eCollection 2025 Jul.