• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心原性休克分类预测心脏重症监护病房死亡率。

Cardiogenic Shock Classification to Predict Mortality in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Oct 29;74(17):2117-2128. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.077. Epub 2019 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.077
PMID:31548097
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A new 5-stage cardiogenic shock (CS) classification scheme was recently proposed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) for the purpose of risk stratification.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to apply the SCAI shock classification in a cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) population.

METHODS

The study retrospectively analyzed Mayo Clinic CICU patients admitted between 2007 and 2015. SCAI CS stages A through E were classified retrospectively using CICU admission data based on the presence of hypotension or tachycardia, hypoperfusion, deterioration, and refractory shock. Hospital mortality in each SCAI shock stage was stratified by cardiac arrest (CA).

RESULTS

Among the 10,004 unique patients, 43.1% had acute coronary syndrome, 46.1% had heart failure, and 12.1% had CA. The proportion of patients in SCAI CS stages A through E was 46.0%, 30.0%, 15.7%, 7.3%, and 1.0% and unadjusted hospital mortality in these stages was 3.0%, 7.1%, 12.4%, 40.4%, and 67.0% (p < 0.001), respectively. After multivariable adjustment, each higher SCAI shock stage was associated with increased hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 1.53 to 6.80; all p < 0.001) compared with SCAI shock stage A, as was CA (adjusted odds ratio: 3.99; 95% confidence interval: 3.27 to 4.86; p < 0.001). Results were consistent in the subset of patients with acute coronary syndrome or heart failure.

CONCLUSIONS

When assessed at the time of CICU admission, the SCAI CS classification, including presence or absence of CA, provided robust hospital mortality risk stratification. This classification system could be implemented as a clinical and research tool to identify, communicate, and predict the risk of death in patients with, and at risk for, CS.

摘要

背景

最近,心血管血管造影和介入学会(SCAI)提出了一种新的 5 期心源性休克(CS)分类方案,旨在进行风险分层。

目的

本研究旨在将 SCAI 休克分类应用于心脏重症监护病房(CICU)人群。

方法

该研究回顾性分析了 2007 年至 2015 年间在梅奥诊所 CICU 住院的患者。根据低血压或心动过速、低灌注、恶化和难治性休克的存在,使用 CICU 入院数据对 SCAI CS 阶段 A 至 E 进行回顾性分类。根据心脏骤停(CA)对每个 SCAI 休克阶段的住院死亡率进行分层。

结果

在 10004 名患者中,43.1%患有急性冠状动脉综合征,46.1%患有心力衰竭,12.1%患有 CA。SCAI CS 阶段 A 至 E 的患者比例分别为 46.0%、30.0%、15.7%、7.3%和 1.0%,这些阶段的未调整住院死亡率分别为 3.0%、7.1%、12.4%、40.4%和 67.0%(p<0.001)。经过多变量调整后,与 SCAI 休克阶段 A 相比,每个更高的 SCAI 休克阶段与更高的住院死亡率相关(调整后的优势比:1.53 至 6.80;所有 p<0.001),CA 也是如此(调整后的优势比:3.99;95%置信区间:3.27 至 4.86;p<0.001)。在急性冠状动脉综合征或心力衰竭患者亚组中,结果一致。

结论

在 CICU 入院时评估时,SCAI CS 分类(包括 CA 的存在与否)提供了可靠的住院死亡率风险分层。该分类系统可作为一种临床和研究工具,用于识别、沟通和预测 CS 患者和高危患者的死亡风险。

相似文献

1
Cardiogenic Shock Classification to Predict Mortality in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.心原性休克分类预测心脏重症监护病房死亡率。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Oct 29;74(17):2117-2128. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.077. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
2
Admission Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention shock stage stratifies post-discharge mortality risk in cardiac intensive care unit patients.收治入院时的休克阶段会使心血管造影及介入治疗学会对心脏重症监护病房患者的出院后死亡率风险进行分层。
Am Heart J. 2020 Jan;219:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.10.012. Epub 2019 Oct 27.
3
Influence of cardiac arrest and SCAI shock stage on cardiac intensive care unit mortality.心搏骤停和 SCAI 休克阶段对心脏重症监护病房死亡率的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Dec;96(7):1350-1359. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28854. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
4
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Is Associated With Increased Mortality Across the Spectrum of Shock Severity in Cardiac Intensive Care Patients.全身炎症反应综合征与心脏重症监护患者休克严重程度范围内死亡率增加相关。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Dec;13(12):e006956. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006956. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
5
Serial Assessment of Shock Severity in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients.连续评估心脏重症监护病房患者休克严重程度。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Dec 5;12(23):e032748. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032748. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
6
[The Value of Using SCAI Cardiogenic Shock Stages in Predicting Mortality in CICU Patients].[使用SCAI心源性休克分期预测重症监护病房患者死亡率的价值]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 May;52(3):503-509. doi: 10.12182/20210560104.
7
Shock Severity Assessment in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients With Sepsis and Mixed Septic-Cardiogenic Shock.心脏重症监护病房中患有脓毒症及脓毒性-心源性混合性休克患者的休克严重程度评估
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2021 Dec 23;6(1):37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.11.008. eCollection 2022 Feb.
8
Incidence and outcomes of acute kidney injury stratified by cardiogenic shock severity.按心源性休克严重程度分层的急性肾损伤的发生率和结局。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Aug 1;98(2):330-340. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29692. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
9
Noninvasive Hemodynamic Assessment of Shock Severity and Mortality Risk Prediction in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.非侵入性血流动力学评估在心脏重症监护病房中的休克严重程度和死亡率风险预测。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Feb;14(2):321-332. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.05.038. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
10
Age and shock severity predict mortality in cardiac intensive care unit patients with and without heart failure.年龄和休克严重程度可预测心脏重症监护病房中伴或不伴心力衰竭患者的死亡率。
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Dec;7(6):3971-3982. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12995. Epub 2020 Sep 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The Predictive Value of Clinical Signs to Identify Shock in Critically Ill Patients.临床体征对危重症患者休克的预测价值
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Sep 5;15(17):2252. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15172252.
2
Cardiogenic shock: diagnosis, phenotyping and management.心源性休克:诊断、分型及管理
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-08049-y.
3
Mortality trends related to cardiogenic shock in heart failure patients aged 25 and older across the United States: A study utilizing the CDC WONDER database from 1999 to 2023.
美国25岁及以上心力衰竭患者心源性休克相关的死亡率趋势:一项利用1999年至2023年疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)WONDER数据库的研究。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025 Jun 26;59:101732. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101732. eCollection 2025 Aug.
4
Shock Stages in Cardiac Surgical Patients: Implications for Post-Cardiotomy Shock and Mortality.心脏外科手术患者的休克阶段:对心脏术后休克和死亡率的影响
JACC Adv. 2025 Jul 10;4(8):101975. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101975.
5
Role of Ischemia/Reperfusion and Oxidative Stress in Shock State.缺血/再灌注及氧化应激在休克状态中的作用
Cells. 2025 May 30;14(11):808. doi: 10.3390/cells14110808.
6
Association between time-varying weighted hemoglobin and all-cause mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock.急性心肌梗死相关心源性休克患者中随时间变化的加权血红蛋白与全因死亡率之间的关联。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 May 14;12:1516100. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1516100. eCollection 2025.
7
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting survival in patients with cardiogenic shock.用于预测心源性休克患者生存率的列线图的开发与验证
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Apr 29;12:1538395. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1538395. eCollection 2025.
8
Evaluation of the Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Ratio Index for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Cardiogenic Shock Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.评估天冬氨酸氨基转移酶与血小板比值指数对预测入住重症监护病房的心源性休克患者院内死亡率的价值。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Apr 16;26(4):26590. doi: 10.31083/RCM26590. eCollection 2025 Apr.
9
Using a Cardiogenic Shock Classification System for Predicting Postcardiotomy Shock Mortality.使用心源性休克分类系统预测心脏手术后休克死亡率。
JACC Asia. 2025 May;5(5):663-676. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.01.007. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
10
Iron deficiency in patients with cardiogenic shock: protocol for a scoping review.心源性休克患者的缺铁:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 19;15(4):e092891. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092891.