Aspers Patrik, Corte Ugo
1Department of Sociology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
2Seminar for Sociology, Universität St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Qual Sociol. 2019;42(2):139-160. doi: 10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
What is qualitative research? If we look for a precise definition of qualitative research, and specifically for one that addresses its distinctive feature of being "qualitative," the literature is meager. In this article we systematically search, identify and analyze a sample of 89 sources using or attempting to define the term "qualitative." Then, drawing on ideas we find scattered across existing work, and based on Becker's classic study of marijuana consumption, we formulate and illustrate a definition that tries to capture its core elements. We define qualitative research as an iterative process in which improved understanding to the scientific community is achieved by making new significant distinctions resulting from getting closer to the phenomenon studied. This formulation is developed as a tool to help improve research designs while stressing that a qualitative dimension is present in quantitative work as well. Additionally, it can facilitate teaching, communication between researchers, diminish the gap between qualitative and quantitative researchers, help to address critiques of qualitative methods, and be used as a standard of evaluation of qualitative research.
什么是定性研究?如果我们寻求定性研究的精确定义,尤其是能阐明其“定性”这一独特特征的定义,相关文献则较为匮乏。在本文中,我们系统地搜索、识别并分析了89篇使用或试图定义“定性”一词的文献样本。然后,借鉴我们在现有研究中零散发现的观点,并基于贝克尔对大麻消费的经典研究,我们制定并阐释了一个试图抓住其核心要素的定义。我们将定性研究定义为一个迭代过程,在这个过程中,通过对所研究现象有更深入的了解而做出新的重要区分,从而增进科学界的理解。这个表述是作为一种工具来帮助改进研究设计的,同时强调定量研究中也存在定性维度。此外,它有助于教学、研究人员之间的交流,缩小定性研究人员和定量研究人员之间的差距,有助于回应针对定性方法的批评,并可用作定性研究的评估标准。