Dahal Niroj, Neupane Bharat Prasad, Pant Binod Prasad, Dhakal Rebat Kumar, Giri Dhudi Raj, Ghimire Puna Ram, Bhandari Laxman Prasad
Kathmandu University School of Education, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Nepal.
Front Res Metr Anal. 2024 Dec 12;9:1512747. doi: 10.3389/frma.2024.1512747. eCollection 2024.
Qualitative research is widely embraced in the social sciences and education. Among the different traditional, modern, and community-oriented qualitative methodologies, we have drawn on our experiences to adopt seven qualitative methodologies: auto/ethnography, narrative inquiry, participatory action research, ethnography, case study, grounded theory, and phenomenology. Despite the abundance of literature on qualitative methodologies, there is still a need for a more focused exploration of participant selection procedures in qualitative studies. This article examines the discourse around participant selection procedures within these seven methodologies, highlighting their unique nuances and differences. It offers practical insights and guidelines for novice and experienced researchers and graduate and postgraduate students to enhance their understanding of participant selection procedures, and some thinking points for consideration. Drawing from our experiences, we aim to provide a useful resource that encourages thoughtful consideration of participant selection in qualitative studies.
定性研究在社会科学和教育领域中得到广泛应用。在不同的传统、现代和以社区为导向的定性研究方法中,我们根据自身经验采用了七种定性研究方法:自我民族志、叙事探究、参与式行动研究、民族志、案例研究、扎根理论和现象学。尽管关于定性研究方法的文献丰富,但仍需要对定性研究中的参与者选择程序进行更有针对性的探索。本文探讨了这七种方法中关于参与者选择程序的论述,突出了它们独特的细微差别和差异。它为新手和经验丰富的研究人员以及研究生和博士生提供了实用的见解和指导方针,以增强他们对参与者选择程序的理解,并提供了一些值得思考的要点。借鉴我们的经验,我们旨在提供一个有用的资源,鼓励在定性研究中对参与者选择进行深入思考。