Suppr超能文献

定性研究中的参与者选择程序:经验与若干思考要点。

Participant selection procedures in qualitative research: experiences and some points for consideration.

作者信息

Dahal Niroj, Neupane Bharat Prasad, Pant Binod Prasad, Dhakal Rebat Kumar, Giri Dhudi Raj, Ghimire Puna Ram, Bhandari Laxman Prasad

机构信息

Kathmandu University School of Education, Lalitpur, Nepal.

Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Nepal.

出版信息

Front Res Metr Anal. 2024 Dec 12;9:1512747. doi: 10.3389/frma.2024.1512747. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Qualitative research is widely embraced in the social sciences and education. Among the different traditional, modern, and community-oriented qualitative methodologies, we have drawn on our experiences to adopt seven qualitative methodologies: auto/ethnography, narrative inquiry, participatory action research, ethnography, case study, grounded theory, and phenomenology. Despite the abundance of literature on qualitative methodologies, there is still a need for a more focused exploration of participant selection procedures in qualitative studies. This article examines the discourse around participant selection procedures within these seven methodologies, highlighting their unique nuances and differences. It offers practical insights and guidelines for novice and experienced researchers and graduate and postgraduate students to enhance their understanding of participant selection procedures, and some thinking points for consideration. Drawing from our experiences, we aim to provide a useful resource that encourages thoughtful consideration of participant selection in qualitative studies.

摘要

定性研究在社会科学和教育领域中得到广泛应用。在不同的传统、现代和以社区为导向的定性研究方法中,我们根据自身经验采用了七种定性研究方法:自我民族志、叙事探究、参与式行动研究、民族志、案例研究、扎根理论和现象学。尽管关于定性研究方法的文献丰富,但仍需要对定性研究中的参与者选择程序进行更有针对性的探索。本文探讨了这七种方法中关于参与者选择程序的论述,突出了它们独特的细微差别和差异。它为新手和经验丰富的研究人员以及研究生和博士生提供了实用的见解和指导方针,以增强他们对参与者选择程序的理解,并提供了一些值得思考的要点。借鉴我们的经验,我们旨在提供一个有用的资源,鼓励在定性研究中对参与者选择进行深入思考。

相似文献

5
Theory utilization in applied qualitative nursing research.理论在应用定性护理研究中的运用。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Dec;78(12):4034-4041. doi: 10.1111/jan.15456. Epub 2022 Oct 9.
10
A health researcher's guide to qualitative methodologies.健康研究人员定性研究方法指南。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007 Oct;31(5):433-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00114.x.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Athletic justice: Scale development and validation.体育正义:量表的开发与验证
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 9;10(2):e24359. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24359. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
4
Qualitative Research in Healthcare: Necessity and Characteristics.医疗保健中的定性研究:必要性与特征。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2023 Jan;56(1):12-20. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.22.451. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
6
Theoretical sampling process in a Straussian Grounded Theory study.施特劳斯扎根理论研究中的理论抽样过程。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2021 Sep 29;55:e20210212. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2021-0212. eCollection 2021.
7
Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples.立意抽样:复杂还是简单?研究案例
J Res Nurs. 2020 Dec;25(8):652-661. doi: 10.1177/1744987120927206. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
9
What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research.定性研究中的“定性”是什么。
Qual Sociol. 2019;42(2):139-160. doi: 10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7. Epub 2019 Feb 27.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验