Jakobsen Vibeke, Korpi Tomas, Lorentzen Thomas
1Danish Center of Social Science Research, Copenhagen, Denmark.
2Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eur J Popul. 2018 Mar 21;35(2):305-328. doi: 10.1007/s10680-018-9483-3. eCollection 2019 May.
Insufficient integration of immigrants into the labour market has been identified as a major problem in the Scandinavian countries Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Integration depends, inter alia, on immigration and integration policy, and for most of the post-war period the policies of the three countries displayed strong similarities. However, in the early 2000s Denmark increasingly deviated from its two neighbours, introducing more restrictive immigration and stricter integration policies. Comparing both pre- and post-reform immigrants across Scandinavia, we assess the wider impact of this comprehensive policy reversal by tracking the evolution of employment and earnings gaps between 1993 and 2006. We use large data sets with individual-level register information allowing us to account for immigrant labour force composition and to examine sub-groups of immigrants. The results do not indicate that the Danish reforms had any clear-cut effect on either employment or earnings among non-Western immigrants. Moreover, integration in Norway and Sweden was not unequivocally worse despite the absence of similar reforms, raising questions regarding the aptness of the Danish reversal.
移民在劳动力市场中融入不足,已被认定为丹麦、挪威和瑞典这几个斯堪的纳维亚国家的一个主要问题。融入情况尤其取决于移民和融入政策,在战后的大部分时期,这三个国家的政策表现出很强的相似性。然而,在21世纪初,丹麦越来越偏离其两个邻国,出台了更具限制性的移民政策和更严格的融入政策。通过比较斯堪的纳维亚半岛改革前后的移民情况,我们通过追踪1993年至2006年间就业和收入差距的变化,评估了这一全面政策逆转的更广泛影响。我们使用了包含个人层面登记信息的大型数据集,这使我们能够考虑移民劳动力构成,并研究移民子群体。结果并未表明丹麦的改革对非西方移民的就业或收入有任何明确的影响。此外,尽管挪威和瑞典没有类似的改革,但它们的融入情况也并非明显更糟,这引发了对丹麦政策逆转适当性的质疑。