Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Department of Cardiology and Clinical Research, University Hospital, Inselspital, Freiburgstrasse, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland.
J Hypertens. 2019 Oct;37(10):2093-2103. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002145.
Use of amlodipine for treatment of arterial hypertension and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) is sometimes limited by occurrence of peripheral edema and headache. We aimed to explore the true magnitude of this phenomenon by determining the rate and placebo-adjusted rate of these side effects.
We performed a meta-analysis by including all randomized, placebo-controlled trials reporting edema and headache with amlodipine in patients with arterial hypertension and CAD. Placebo-adjusted rate (%) was determined as follows: (SE amlodipine % - SE placebo %)/SE amlodipine %.
Data from 7226 patients of 22 trials were analyzed. Rate of edema was higher on amlodipine vs. placebo (16.6 vs. 6.2%, risk ratio: 2.9, 95% CI: 2.50-3.36, P < 0.0001). The placebo-adjusted rate was 63%, indicating that 37% of edema cases were unrelated to amlodipine. Treatment with low/medium doses (2.5-5 mg) resulted in lower rates of edema (risk ratio: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.41-2.88, P = 0.0001) vs. high dose (10 mg) (risk ratio: 3.08, 95% CI 2.62-3.60, P < 0.0001, Pforinteraction = 0.03). Incidence of headache was reduced using amlodipine vs. placebo (7.9 vs. 10.9%, risk ratio: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.65-0.90, P = 0.002) and was driven by use of low/medium doses (risk ratio: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.40-0.69, P < 0.00001 vs. risk ratio: 0.92, 95%-CI: 0.74-1.15, P = 0.45, for high doses, Pforinteraction = 0.002).
Although risks of peripheral edema are three-fold higher on amlodipine, up to one-third of edema cases on amlodipine might not be induced by amlodipine. Headache is reduced on amlodipine treatment, mainly driven by use of this drug at low/medium doses.
氨氯地平用于治疗动脉高血压和稳定型冠状动脉疾病(CAD)时,有时会因出现外周水肿和头痛而受到限制。我们旨在通过确定这些副作用的发生率和安慰剂调整发生率来探究这种现象的真实程度。
我们通过纳入所有报告氨氯地平治疗动脉高血压和 CAD 患者出现水肿和头痛的随机、安慰剂对照试验进行荟萃分析。采用如下方法确定安慰剂调整发生率(%):(氨氯地平的 SE % - 安慰剂的 SE %)/氨氯地平的 SE %。
对 22 项试验的 7226 名患者的数据进行了分析。与安慰剂相比,氨氯地平治疗组的水肿发生率更高(16.6% vs. 6.2%,风险比:2.9,95%置信区间:2.50-3.36,P<0.0001)。安慰剂调整发生率为 63%,表明 37%的水肿病例与氨氯地平无关。使用低/中剂量(2.5-5mg)治疗可降低水肿发生率(风险比:2.01,95%置信区间:1.41-2.88,P=0.0001),而高剂量(10mg)治疗的水肿发生率更高(风险比:3.08,95%置信区间 2.62-3.60,P<0.0001,Pforinteraction=0.03)。与安慰剂相比,氨氯地平治疗组的头痛发生率降低(7.9% vs. 10.9%,风险比:0.77,95%置信区间:0.65-0.90,P=0.002),且这主要是由使用低/中剂量所致(风险比:0.52,95%置信区间:0.40-0.69,P<0.00001,vs. 风险比:0.92,95%置信区间:0.74-1.15,P=0.45,高剂量,Pforinteraction=0.002)。
尽管氨氯地平的外周水肿风险增加了三倍,但高达三分之一的氨氯地平相关水肿病例可能不是由氨氯地平引起的。氨氯地平治疗可降低头痛发生率,主要是由低/中剂量用药驱动的。