Blakeman John R, Laskowski Pamela S
About the Authors John R. Blakeman, MSN, RN, PCCN-K, is an instructor, and Pamela S. Laskowski, PhD, RN, CNE, is an assistant professor, School of Nursing, Millikin University, Decatur, Illinois. Mr. Blakeman is a PhD candidate at Mennonite College of Nursing, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois. The authors are grateful to Hannah Donoho, MSN, RN, for her assistance, MyoungJin Kim, PhD, for his statistical knowledge and suggestions, and Elizabeth A. Simpson and Sheryl J. Samuelson, PhD, RN, for their review of this manuscript. For more information, contact Mr. Blakeman at
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2020 Mar/Apr;41(2):97-102. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000497.
The purpose of this study was to explore nurse educators' beliefs and experiences regarding students changing answers on multiple-choice examinations.
Studies suggest that answer-changing behavior does not negatively affect academic performance and may actually have a positive impact, but published studies reporting nurse educators' beliefs and experiences on this topic are limited.
A mixed-methods approach, QUAN + Qual, was employed. A survey with closed- and open-ended questions was emailed to nurse educators in Illinois.
Of the 125 nurse educators who completed the survey, a majority held negative views of answer-changing behavior; many noted that their experiences with students had shaped their views.
Nurse educators in this sample held an overall negative view of this behavior, contrary to the overall body of evidence suggesting there is possible benefit in changing answers. Several reasons exist to explain the inconsistency observed.
本研究旨在探讨护理教育工作者对于学生在多项选择题考试中更改答案的看法和经历。
研究表明,更改答案的行为不会对学业成绩产生负面影响,实际上可能还有积极影响,但关于护理教育工作者在这一主题上的看法和经历的已发表研究有限。
采用了定量+定性的混合方法。通过电子邮件向伊利诺伊州的护理教育工作者发送了一份包含封闭式和开放式问题的调查问卷。
在完成调查的125名护理教育工作者中,大多数人对更改答案的行为持负面看法;许多人指出,他们与学生的经历塑造了他们的观点。
本样本中的护理教育工作者对这种行为总体持负面看法,这与表明更改答案可能有益的整体证据相悖。存在几个原因可以解释所观察到的这种不一致。