Psychological Methods and Assessment, Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Leopoldstraße 13, 80802 Munich, Germany.
Empirical and Educational Psychology, Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Leopoldstraße 13, 80802 Munich, Germany.
Cognition. 2019 Aug;189:275-298. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 May 17.
Although prior investigations have revealed cognitive abilities to be important predictors of multitasking behavior, few investigations have been conducted on the relation between executive functions (EFs) and multitasking behavior. The current study examines the underlying cognitive constructs associated with the concept of multitasking behavior. A sample of 202 young adults completed a battery of EFs (shifting, updating, and inhibition), three working memory capacity (WMC) tests, three relational integration tests, two divided attention tests, and a multitasking scenario (Simultaneous Capacity). First, in direct replication attempts, the results replicated the multitasking behavior model (Bühner, König, Pick, & Krumm, 2006) and partially replicated the three-factor and nested factors EFs models (Friedman et al., 2016). Second, hierarchical multiple regression analyses and relative weight analyses revealed that updating, inhibition, relational integration, and divided attention had strong contributions in explaining multitasking behavior variance, whereas shifting and WMC did not show any explanatory power beyond these constructs. Finally, using structural equation modeling, we found that the general EF ability (common EF) representing variance common to shifting, updating, and inhibition highly overlapped with multitasking behavior. Our results are of value not only to shed light on the relevant cognitive correlates of multitasking behavior but also to position multitasking behavior in an established framework of cognitive abilities.
尽管先前的研究已经揭示了认知能力是多任务行为的重要预测因素,但很少有研究探讨执行功能(EFs)与多任务行为之间的关系。本研究考察了与多任务行为概念相关的潜在认知结构。202 名年轻成年人完成了一系列执行功能(转换、更新和抑制)、三种工作记忆容量(WMC)测试、三种关系整合测试、两种分散注意力测试以及一个多任务场景(同时容量)。首先,在直接复制尝试中,结果复制了多任务行为模型(Bühner、König、Pick 和 Krumm,2006),并部分复制了三因素和嵌套因素执行功能模型(Friedman 等人,2016)。其次,分层多元回归分析和相对权重分析表明,更新、抑制、关系整合和分散注意力对解释多任务行为方差具有很强的贡献,而转换和 WMC 除了这些结构之外没有表现出任何解释力。最后,使用结构方程模型,我们发现代表转换、更新和抑制共同方差的一般执行功能能力(共同执行功能)与多任务行为高度重叠。我们的研究结果不仅有助于阐明多任务行为的相关认知相关性,而且有助于在已建立的认知能力框架中定位多任务行为。