Electrophysiologic and anatomic factors predictive of a need for touch-up radiofrequency application for complete pulmonary vein isolation: Comparison between hot balloon- and cryoballoon-based ablation.

INTRODUCTION

Although electrophysiologic and anatomic factors associated with the need for touch-up radiofrequency (RF) applications after cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) have been well described, those associated with the need for such touch-up after hot balloon ablation (HBA) have not. We aimed to identify factors predictive of the need for touch-up applications following HBA.

METHODS

Anatomic and electrophysiologic factors predictive of the need for touch-up RF ablation were compared between 46 propensity score-matched pairs of patients who underwent HBA or CBA for AF.

RESULTS

Touch-up RF ablation was more frequently required after HBA than after CBA (57% vs 30%, respectively; P = .01), and mostly at the anterior aspect of the left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV) carina after HBA (35%) but at the inferior aspect of the right inferior PV (RIPV) after CBA (71%). Post HBA touch-up was associated with male gender, a CHA DS -VASc score ≤ 2, PV-left atrial bipolar voltage ≥ 1.35 mV, and PV trunk length ≥ 24.0 mm; post CBA touch-up associated with a history of heart failure.

CONCLUSION

Following balloon ablation for AF, there may be a need for touch-up applications, especially at the LSPV ridge after HBA but at the RIPV after CBA. It may behoove operators to expect a need for touch-up following HBA when patients are male, have a CHA DS -VASc score ≤ 2 points, when PV-LA bipolar voltage is ≥ 1.35 mV, or when the PV trunk is ≥ 24.0 mm or following CBA when there is a history of heart failure.