US/BE Vaccine Research and Development Center, Clinical R&D, GSK, Wavre, Belgium.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(11):2624-2636. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1608745. Epub 2019 May 22.
Seasonal influenza vaccines are frequently reformulated, leading to specific challenges for continuous benefit/risk monitoring. In 2014, the European Medicines Agency started requiring annual enhanced safety surveillance (ESS). This article provides a perspective on ESS studies conducted ever since and aims to map existing initiatives used to monitor adverse events following influenza immunization. Of 11 ESS studies, reporting surveillance data of at least five different vaccine brands during four seasons, all were able to rapidly capture vaccine-specific adverse events of interest reports. However, challenges have been identified during study implementation, including recruitment of sufficient participants, enrolling younger age groups, collecting data of vaccine batch numbers, comparing observed with expected rates and achieving adequate return of reported events. Harmonizing safety monitoring standards across countries, and bridging between routine pharmacovigilance and ESS, is likely to allow more comprehensive assessments of influenza vaccine safety, requiring close collaboration between regulators, public health, and manufacturers.
季节性流感疫苗经常进行配方改革,这给持续的效益/风险监测带来了特殊挑战。自 2014 年以来,欧洲药品管理局开始要求进行年度强化安全性监测(ESS)。本文对自那时以来开展的 ESS 研究提供了一个视角,并旨在绘制用于监测流感疫苗接种后不良事件的现有举措。在 11 项 ESS 研究中,有 11 项报告了至少在四个季节中监测到的五种不同疫苗品牌的监测数据,所有研究都能够迅速捕捉到疫苗特异性不良事件的报告。然而,在研究实施过程中发现了一些挑战,包括招募足够的参与者、招募年龄较小的群体、收集疫苗批次号的数据、比较观察到的与预期的比率以及实现报告事件的充分回报。在各国之间协调安全监测标准,并在常规药物警戒和 ESS 之间架起桥梁,可能会允许更全面地评估流感疫苗的安全性,这需要监管机构、公共卫生和制造商之间的密切合作。