Suppr超能文献

甲真菌病单药治疗:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Monotherapy for toenail onychomycosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Mediprobe Research Inc., London, ON, Canada.

Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto School of Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 2020 Feb;182(2):287-299. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18155. Epub 2019 Aug 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Onychomycosis is a fungal infection of the nail caused by dermatophytes, yeasts and nondermatophyte moulds that accounts for approximately 50% of all nail-related disease.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of monotherapy and combination treatments for toenail onychomycosis using a network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

Quality of evidence was assessed using Cochrane-compliant rules and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. Efficacy and safety outcomes were compared using a random-effects NMA to estimate pooled odds ratios (ORs) of direct and indirect comparisons among oral and topical treatments (PROSPERO 2015: CRD42018086912). There were not enough eligible combination and device-based therapy trials to include in the NMA.

RESULTS

Of 77 randomized controlled trials, 26 were included in the ORs (8136 patients). There were no significant inconsistencies between the direct and indirect evidence. Relative effects show that the odds of mycological cure with continuous terbinafine 250 mg or continuous itraconazole 200 mg are significantly greater than topical treatments. Fluconazole, pulse regimens of terbinafine and itraconazole, and topical treatments did not differ significantly in the odds of achieving mycological cure. The ORs of adverse events occurring with oral or topical treatments were not significantly different from each other. For mycological cure, evidence was of moderate or high quality while evidence ranged from very low to high quality for adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review suggests that oral and topical treatments for toenail onychomycosis are safe and effective in producing mycological cure. What's already known about this topic? Topical treatments traditionally have lower success rates than oral treatments. Oral treatments have the advantage of shorter treatment durations, but also present challenges in cases of drug-drug interactions or immunosuppression. A network meta-analysis (NMA) gathers data from indirect evidence to gain confidence about all treatment comparisons and allows for estimation of comparative effects that have not been investigated in head-to-head randomized clinical trials (RCTs). What does this study add? This NMA of efficacy and safety includes all RCTs of oral, topical, combination and device-based treatments for toenail onychomycosis, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement for NMA. The odds of achieving mycological cure with continuous terbinafine 250 mg or continuous itraconazole 200 mg were significantly greater than topical treatments. Fluconazole, pulse regimens of terbinafine and itraconazole, and topical treatments did not differ significantly in the odds of achieving mycological cure.

摘要

背景

甲真菌病是一种由真菌引起的指甲感染,包括皮肤癣菌、酵母菌和非皮肤癣菌霉菌,约占所有指甲相关疾病的 50%。

目的

本研究旨在通过网络荟萃分析(NMA)评估甲真菌病的单一疗法和联合治疗的有效性和安全性。

方法

使用符合 Cochrane 标准的规则和推荐评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法评估证据质量。使用随机效应 NMA 比较疗效和安全性结局,以估计口服和局部治疗之间直接和间接比较的汇总比值比(OR)(PROSPERO 2015:CRD42018086912)。没有足够的合格联合和基于设备的治疗试验纳入 NMA。

结果

在 77 项随机对照试验中,26 项被纳入 OR(8136 名患者)。直接证据和间接证据之间没有显著不一致。相对效应表明,持续使用特比萘芬 250 mg 或伊曲康唑 200 mg 的连续治疗在真菌学治愈率方面显著高于局部治疗。氟康唑、特比萘芬和伊曲康唑的脉冲治疗方案以及局部治疗在真菌学治愈率方面没有显著差异。口服或局部治疗不良反应的 OR 彼此之间无显著差异。对于真菌学治愈率,证据质量为中等到高质量,而不良反应的证据质量范围从极低到高质量。

结论

本综述表明,甲真菌病的口服和局部治疗在产生真菌学治愈率方面是安全有效的。关于这个主题已经知道了什么?传统上,局部治疗的成功率低于口服治疗。口服治疗的优点是治疗持续时间较短,但在药物相互作用或免疫抑制的情况下也存在挑战。网络荟萃分析(NMA)从间接证据中收集数据,以获得对所有治疗比较的信心,并允许估计未在头对头随机临床试验(RCT)中进行调查的比较效果。这项研究增加了什么?这项关于疗效和安全性的 NMA 包括所有针对趾甲甲真菌病的口服、局部、联合和基于设备的治疗的 RCT,符合系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明。连续使用特比萘芬 250 mg 或伊曲康唑 200 mg 的连续治疗在真菌学治愈率方面显著高于局部治疗。氟康唑、特比萘芬和伊曲康唑的脉冲治疗方案以及局部治疗在真菌学治愈率方面没有显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验