1 Institute of Psychology, University of Bern.
2 Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives (SCALab), Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 9193, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université de Lille.
Psychol Sci. 2019 Jul;30(7):1082-1086. doi: 10.1177/0956797619847166. Epub 2019 May 23.
Peripheral vision is strongly limited by , the deleterious influence of flanking items on target perception. Distinguishing what is seen from what is merely inferred in crowding is difficult because task demands and prior knowledge may influence observers' reports. Here, we used a standard identification task in which participants were susceptible to these influences, and to minimize them, we used a free-report-and-drawing paradigm. Three letters were presented in the periphery. In Experiment 1, 10 participants were asked to identify the central target letter. In Experiment 2, 25 participants freely named and drew what they saw. When three identical letters were presented, performance was almost perfect in Experiment 1, but it was very poor in Experiment 2, in which most participants reported only two letters. Our study reveals limitations of standard crowding paradigms and uncovers a hitherto unrecognized effect that we call .
周边视觉受到严重限制,侧翼项目对目标感知的有害影响。在拥挤中区分所见和仅推断的内容很困难,因为任务要求和先验知识可能会影响观察者的报告。在这里,我们使用了一种标准的识别任务,参与者容易受到这些影响的影响,为了最大程度地减少这些影响,我们使用了自由报告和绘图范式。三个字母在周边呈现。在实验 1 中,10 名参与者被要求识别中心目标字母。在实验 2 中,25 名参与者自由命名并绘制他们所看到的内容。当呈现三个相同的字母时,在实验 1 中表现几乎完美,但在实验 2 中表现非常差,大多数参与者仅报告了两个字母。我们的研究揭示了标准拥挤范式的局限性,并揭示了一种迄今为止尚未被认识到的效应,我们称之为“报告二字效应”。