Department of Environmental Sciences; Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Department of Entomology; University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2019 May 23;14(5):e0216286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216286. eCollection 2019.
Managed honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies are kept at much greater densities than naturally occurring feral or wild colonies, which may have detrimental effects on colony health and survival, disease spread, and drifting behavior (bee movement between natal and non-natal colonies). We assessed the effects of a straightforward apiary management intervention (altering the density and visual appearance of colonies) on colony health. Specifically, we established three "high density / high drift" ("HD") and three "low density / low drift" ("LD") apiary configurations, each consisting of eight bee colonies. Hives in the HD apiary configuration were of the same color and placed 1m apart in a single linear array, while hives in the LD apiary configuration were placed 10m apart at different heights, facing outwards in a circle, and made visually distinctive with colors and symbols to reduce accidental drift between colonies. We investigated disease transmission and dynamics between the apiary configurations by clearing all colonies of the parasitic mite Varroa destructor, and subsequently inoculating two randomly-chosen colonies per apiary with controlled mite doses. We monitored the colonies for two years and found that the LD apiary configuration had significantly greater honey production and reduced overwinter mortality. Inoculation and apiary management intervention interacted to affect brood mite levels, with the highest levels in the inoculated colonies in the HD configuration. Finally, foragers were more than three times more likely to drift in the HD apiary configurations. Our results suggest that a relatively straightforward management change-placing colonies in low-density visually complex circles rather than high-density visually similar linear arrays-can provide meaningful benefits to the health and productivity of managed honey bee colonies.
饲养的蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)群体的密度远高于自然发生的野生或野化群体,这可能对群体健康和生存、疾病传播和漂移行为(蜜蜂在出生地和非出生地群体之间的移动)产生不利影响。我们评估了一种简单的蜂场管理干预(改变群体的密度和外观)对群体健康的影响。具体来说,我们建立了三个“高密度/高漂移”(“HD”)和三个“低密度/低漂移”(“LD”)蜂场配置,每个配置由八个蜜蜂群体组成。HD 蜂场配置中的蜂箱颜色相同,彼此间隔 1 米,排成一条直线;而 LD 蜂场配置中的蜂箱间隔 10 米,位于不同高度,向外呈圆形排列,并用颜色和符号使其具有视觉上的区别,以减少群体之间的意外漂移。我们通过清除所有寄生螨虫 Varroa destructor 来研究疾病传播和蜂场配置之间的动态,然后向每个蜂场的两个随机选择的群体接种受控的螨虫剂量。我们对这些群体进行了两年的监测,发现 LD 蜂场配置的蜂蜜产量显著更高,越冬死亡率更低。接种和蜂场管理干预相互作用影响螨虫水平,高密度配置中接种的群体螨虫水平最高。最后,在 HD 蜂场配置中,觅食者漂移的可能性是 LD 蜂场配置的三倍多。我们的结果表明,相对简单的管理变化——将群体放置在低密度、视觉复杂的圆形中,而不是高密度、视觉相似的线性排列中——可以为饲养蜜蜂的健康和生产力提供有意义的益处。