Agroscope, Swiss Bee Research Centre, Bern, Switzerland.
J Insect Sci. 2024 Jul 1;24(4). doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieae068.
Since the global invasion of the ectoparasitic mite Varroa destructor (Anderson and Trueman), selection of mite-resistant honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies appears challenging and has to date not broadly reduced colony mortality. The low published estimated heritability values for mite infestation levels could explain the limited genetic progresses obtained so far. We hypothesize that intercolonial horizontal mite transmission could differentially affect the single colonies located in a given apiary and therefore invisibly bias colony infestation phenotypes. This bias may be lower in regions with lower colony density, providing suitable conditions to set up evaluation apiaries. To verify these hypotheses, we monitored mite infestation and reinvasion in experimental colonies, as well as infestation in neighboring colonies belonging to beekeepers in three areas with variable colony densities in the canton of Bern, Switzerland during three consecutive beekeeping seasons. Mite immigration fluctuated between apiaries and years and significantly contributed to colony infestation level. Depending on apiary and year, 17-48% of the mites present in the experimental colonies at the time of the summer oxalic acid final treatment potentially derived from mite immigration that had occurred since mid-spring. Mite immigration was not linked to local colony density or the infestation levels of beekeepers' colonies located within 2 km. Our results do not prove that apiaries for colony evaluation should necessarily be established in areas with low colony density. However, they highlight the high impact of beekeeping management practices on mite colony infestation levels.
自从外寄生螨瓦螨(Varroa destructor)(Anderson and Trueman)在全球范围内入侵以来,选择对螨具有抗性的蜜蜂(Apis mellifera L.)群体似乎具有挑战性,并且迄今为止并未广泛降低群体死亡率。螨侵染水平的遗传力值较低,这可能解释了迄今为止获得的遗传进展有限。我们假设,殖民地之间的水平螨传播可能会对位于特定蜂场中的单个殖民地产生不同的影响,从而使殖民地侵染表型产生无形的偏差。在群体密度较低的地区,这种偏差可能较低,为建立评估蜂场提供了合适的条件。为了验证这些假设,我们在瑞士伯尔尼州的三个地区,在三个连续的养蜂季节中,监测了实验群体中的螨侵染和再侵染情况,以及养蜂者的邻近群体的侵染情况。螨的迁入在蜂场和年份之间波动,并对殖民地侵染水平有显著贡献。根据蜂场和年份的不同,在夏季最后一次使用草酸处理时,实验群体中存在的螨中,有 17-48%可能来自于春季中期以来发生的螨迁入。螨的迁入与当地群体密度或位于 2 公里范围内的养蜂者群体的侵染水平无关。我们的结果并不能证明用于群体评估的蜂场必须建立在群体密度较低的地区。然而,它们突出了养蜂管理实践对螨群体侵染水平的重大影响。