Kung Joseph S, Tran William T, Poon Ian, Atenafu Eshetu G, Courneyea Lorraine, Higgins Kevin, Enepekides Danny, Sahgal Arjun, Chin Lee, Karam Irene
1 Division of Radiation Therapy, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jan-Dec;18:1533033819853824. doi: 10.1177/1533033819853824.
Modern linear accelerators are equipped with cone beam computed tomography and robotic couches that can correct for errors in the translational (X, Y, Z) and rotational (α, β, γ) axes prior to treatment delivery. Here, we compared the positional accuracy of 2 cone beam registration approaches: (1) employing translational shifts only in 3 degrees of freedom (X, Y, Z), versus; (2) using translational-rotational shifts in 6 degrees of freedom (X, Y, Z, α, β, γ).
This retrospective study examined 140 interfraction cone beam images from 20 patients with head and neck cancer treated with standard intensity-modulated radiation therapy. The cone beam images were matched to planning simulation scans in 3, then in 6 degrees of freedom, using the mandible, clivus, and C2 and C7 vertebrae as surrogate volumes. Statistical analyses included a generalized mixed model and was used to assess whether there were significant differences in acceptable registrations between the 2 correction methods.
The rates of improvement with corrections in 6 degrees of freedom for the mandible with a 5-mm expansion margin were 54.55% ( P = .793), for the clivus 85.71% ( P = .222), and for C7 87.50% ( P = .015). There was a 100% increase in acceptability for the C2 vertebra within the 5-mm margin ( P < .001). For the 3-mm expansion margin, the rates of improvement for the mandible, clivus, C2, and C7 were 63.16% ( P = .070), 91.30% ( P = .011), 84.21% ( P = .027), and 76.92% ( P < .001), respectively.
Significant registration improvements with the use of rotational corrections with a 5-mm expansion margin are only seen in the C7 vertebra. At the 3-mm margin, significant improvements are found for the C2, C7, and clivus registrations, suggesting that intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatments for head and neck cancers with 3-mm planning target volume margins may benefit from corrections in 6 degrees of freedom.
现代直线加速器配备了锥形束计算机断层扫描和机器人治疗床,可在治疗实施前校正平移(X、Y、Z)和旋转(α、β、γ)轴上的误差。在此,我们比较了两种锥形束配准方法的位置准确性:(1)仅在3个自由度(X、Y、Z)上采用平移移位,与;(2)在6个自由度(X、Y、Z、α、β、γ)上使用平移 - 旋转移位。
这项回顾性研究检查了20例接受标准调强放射治疗的头颈癌患者的140幅分次间锥形束图像。使用下颌骨、斜坡以及C2和C7椎体作为替代体积,先在3个自由度,然后在6个自由度上,将锥形束图像与计划模拟扫描进行匹配。统计分析包括广义混合模型,用于评估两种校正方法在可接受配准方面是否存在显著差异。
对于下颌骨,在5毫米扩展边界下进行6自由度校正后的改善率为54.55%(P = 0.793),斜坡为85.71%(P = 0.222),C7为87.50%(P = 0.015)。在5毫米边界内,C2椎体的可接受性提高了100%(P < 0.001)。对于3毫米扩展边界,下颌骨、斜坡、C2和C7的改善率分别为63.16%(P = 0.070)、91.30%(P = 0.011)、84.21%(P = 0.027)和76.92%(P < 0.001)。
仅在C7椎体中,使用5毫米扩展边界的旋转校正可实现显著的配准改善。在3毫米边界时,C2、C7和斜坡的配准有显著改善,这表明对于计划靶体积边界为3毫米的头颈癌调强放射治疗,6自由度校正可能有益。