Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.
CICPSI, Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.
Psychol Rep. 2020 Aug;123(4):1452-1469. doi: 10.1177/0033294119850490. Epub 2019 May 24.
Detection of mental distress cases is essential in clinical practice, especially in primary care. Screening instruments could be useful and effective tools to help identify them. This study sought to evaluate the utility and capability of the Mental Health Inventory (MHI)-38 and MHI-5 in identifying cases suffering from mental distress from those who do not. The validity and accuracy of these MHI versions were tested using as gold standards: two samples of adults, one with clinical complaints ( = 33) and another without clinical complaints ( = 31); and the scores in Scales of Psychological Well-Being and in a psychopathology inventory (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2). Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to define cutpoints, which is the Youden's index for the optimization criteria. The data analysis indicated an optimal cutpoint of 7.19 for MHI-38 and of 53 (recoded to a 0-100 scale) for MHI-5 to differentiate clinical cases from those who are not. These results indicate cutpoint values similar to those of previous studies in the case of MHI-5 and provide useful reference values for MHI-38. The need to replicate this study with larger samples and with controlled clinical conditions and type of pathology is also discussed.
在临床实践中,尤其是在初级保健中,检测精神困扰病例至关重要。筛查工具可能是帮助识别这些病例的有用且有效的工具。本研究旨在评估心理健康量表(MHI)-38 和 MHI-5 用于识别有精神困扰病例和无精神困扰病例的效用和能力。使用以下金标准测试这些 MHI 版本的有效性和准确性:有临床症状的成年人样本( = 33)和无临床症状的成年人样本( = 31);以及心理幸福感量表和心理病理学量表(明尼苏达多相人格问卷 2)的得分。使用受试者工作特征曲线来定义切点,这是优化标准的约登指数。数据分析表明,MHI-38 的最佳切点为 7.19,MHI-5 的最佳切点为 53(转换为 0-100 量表),用于区分有临床症状的病例和无临床症状的病例。这些结果表明 MHI-5 的切点值与之前的研究相似,并为 MHI-38 提供了有用的参考值。还讨论了需要用更大的样本量和控制的临床条件和病理类型重复这项研究的必要性。