Nakos Elias A, Boboridis Konstadinos G, Kakavouti-Doudou Angeliki A, Almaliotis Diamantis D, Sioulis Christos E, Karampatakis Vasileios E
424 Army General Training Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Third Ophthalmology Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Ophthalmol Ther. 2019 Sep;8(3):397-406. doi: 10.1007/s40123-019-0189-3. Epub 2019 May 24.
To compare the anatomical and functional outcome and changes in the quality of life (QoL) over time of the lateral tarsal strip (LTS) versus the Quickert everting sutures (ES) for the repair of primary involutional lower eyelid entropion.
Forty-five patients (54 eyes) with primary involutional lower eyelid entropion were recruited in a prospective randomized clinical trial over 3-year period. Twenty-six eyes were randomized to the LTS technique and 28 to the ES procedure. Primary outcome was the anatomical correction of the eyelid at the final assessment in 1 year. Secondary outcomes were function and symptoms assessment with a QoL questionnaire at 6 months. Fisher's exact test was used for the statistical analysis of success rate and gender study and Mann-Whitney U test and logistic regression analysis were used for age study. The Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for the analysis of the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25).
At the 6-month follow-up, 25 eyes (96.2%) of the LTS group and 20 (71.4%) of the ES group had favorable outcome (P = 0.025). There were one and eight eyes, respectively, with early recurrence. At the final 12-month evaluation, 23 eyes (88.5%) in the LTS group and 16 eyes (57.1%) in the ES group were successful. Three (11.5%) and 12 (42.9%) eyes respectively showed postoperative recurrence. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.015) for the primary outcome, whereas age and gender did not influence success. The NEI VFQ-25 showed statistically significant subjective improvement from baseline in most categories of the QoL. No significant difference between the two procedures was detected at 6 months.
This study suggests that the LTS procedure has a superior surgical success rate and reduction of symptoms compared with the ES for the repair of involutional lower eyelid entropion. Both procedures showed similar improvement of the postoperative QoL.
International Clinical Trials Registry Platform identifier: ACTRN12616000620426.
比较外侧睑板条(LTS)与奎克特外翻缝合术(ES)修复原发性退行性下睑内翻的解剖和功能结果以及随时间推移生活质量(QoL)的变化。
在一项为期3年的前瞻性随机临床试验中招募了45例(54只眼)原发性退行性下睑内翻患者。26只眼随机分配至LTS技术组,28只眼分配至ES手术组。主要结局是1年后最终评估时眼睑的解剖学矫正。次要结局是在6个月时使用QoL问卷进行功能和症状评估。采用Fisher精确检验对成功率和性别进行统计学分析,采用曼-惠特尼U检验和逻辑回归分析对年龄进行研究。采用Wilcoxon和曼-惠特尼U检验对美国国立眼科研究所视觉功能问卷-25(NEI VFQ-25)进行分析。
在6个月随访时,LTS组25只眼(96.2%)和ES组20只眼(71.4%)预后良好(P = 0.025)。分别有1只和8只眼早期复发。在最终的12个月评估中,LTS组23只眼(88.5%)和ES组16只眼(57.1%)手术成功。分别有3只(11.5%)和12只(42.9%)眼出现术后复发。两组主要结局存在统计学显著差异(P = 0.015),而年龄和性别不影响手术成功率。NEI VFQ-25显示,在大多数QoL类别中,与基线相比主观改善具有统计学显著性。在6个月时未检测到两种手术之间存在显著差异。
本研究表明,与ES相比,LTS手术修复退行性下睑内翻的手术成功率更高,症状减轻更明显。两种手术术后QoL改善相似。
国际临床试验注册平台标识符:ACTRN12616000620426。