Boboridis Kostas G, Bunce Catey
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Pavlou Mela 16, 54622 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7(12):CD002221. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002221.pub2.
Entropion is a condition in which the eyelid margin turns in against the eyeball. Involutional or senile entropion is one of the most common lower lid malpositions in the elderly. The interventions described and currently used for the treatment of this condition are surgical in nature, although non-surgical temporary medical treatment for the early stages of entropion has also been reported. The relative effectiveness of these interventions has not yet been resolved.
To examine the effect of interventions for involutional entropion and to assess whether any method is superior to any other.
We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 10), MEDLINE (January 1950 to November 2011), EMBASE (January 1980 to November 2011), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com),ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). There were no date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. The electronic databases were last searched on 2 November 2011. We also searched oculoplastic textbooks, conference proceedings from the European and American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (ESOPRS, ASOPRS), European Ophthalmological Society (SOE), the Association for Recearch in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) and American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) for the years 2000 to 2009 to identify relevant data. We attempted to contact researchers who are active in this field for information about further published or unpublished studies.
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with no restriction on date or language comparing two or more surgical methods for correction of involutional lower eyelid entropion in people older than 60 years of age with involutional lower lid entropion.
Each review author independently assessed study abstracts identified from the electronic and manual searches. Author analysis was then compared and full papers for appropriate studies were obtained according to the inclusion criteria. Disagreements between the authors were resolved by discussion.
We identified one RCT which met our inclusion criteria and was included in this review. Sixty-three participants with primary involutional lower eyelid entropion were randomised to everting sutures alone or everting sutures with a lateral tarsal strip. Eight participants were lost to follow-up. The trial indicates that the combined procedure for horizontal and vertical eyelid tightening in the form of everting sutures and lateral tarsal strip is highly curative for involutional entropion compared to vertical tightening in the form of everting sutures alone. The superiority of the combined approach is also supported by many good quality uncontrolled studies on specific surgical procedures but these were not included in the analysis as they were not part of the inclusion criteria.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: A single RCT showed that the combination of horizontal and vertical eyelid tightening with everting sutures and lateral tarsal strip is highly efficient for entropion compared to vertical tightening with everting sutures alone. Retrospective case series studies also support the combined surgical repair but details from these studies on specific surgical techniques cannot be included in the analysis.Evidence from a single RCT is unlikely to change clinical practice and thus it is still our view that there is a clear need for more randomised studies comparing two or more surgical techniques for entropion surgery addressing the recurrence and complications rate.
睑内翻是一种睑缘向眼球翻转的病症。退行性或老年性睑内翻是老年人中最常见的下睑位置异常之一。尽管也有报道称在睑内翻早期可进行非手术临时性药物治疗,但目前所描述及使用的针对该病症的干预措施本质上都是手术治疗。这些干预措施的相对有效性尚未得到解决。
研究针对退行性睑内翻的干预措施的效果,并评估是否存在任何一种方法优于其他方法。
我们检索了Cochrane中心对照试验注册库(CENTRAL,其中包含Cochrane眼科和视力组试验注册库)(《Cochrane图书馆》2011年第10期)、MEDLINE(1950年1月至2011年11月)、EMBASE(1980年1月至2011年11月)、对照试验元注册库(mRCT)(www.controlled-trials.com)、ClinicalTrials.gov(http://clinicaltrials.gov)以及世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)(www.who.int/ictrp/search/en)。电子检索试验时没有日期或语言限制。电子数据库的最后一次检索时间为2011年11月2日。我们还检索了2000年至2009年的眼整形教科书、欧美眼科整形与重建外科学会(ESOPRS、ASOPRS)、欧洲眼科学会(SOE)、视觉与眼科学研究协会(ARVO)以及美国眼科学会(AAO)的会议论文集,以识别相关数据。我们试图联系该领域的活跃研究人员,获取有关进一步已发表或未发表研究的信息。
我们纳入了无日期或语言限制的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验比较了两种或更多种手术方法,用于矫正60岁以上患有退行性下睑睑内翻的人群的退行性下睑睑内翻。
每位综述作者独立评估从电子检索和手工检索中识别出的研究摘要。然后比较作者的分析结果,并根据纳入标准获取适当研究的全文。作者之间的分歧通过讨论解决。
我们识别出一项符合我们纳入标准的RCT,并将其纳入本综述。63例原发性退行性下睑睑内翻患者被随机分为单纯外翻缝线组或外翻缝线联合外侧睑板条组。8例患者失访。该试验表明,与单纯采用外翻缝线进行垂直收紧相比,采用外翻缝线联合外侧睑板条进行水平和垂直睑收紧的联合手术对退行性睑内翻具有很高的治愈率。许多关于特定手术方法的高质量非对照研究也支持联合手术方法的优越性,但由于这些研究不属于纳入标准的一部分,因此未纳入分析。
一项RCT表明,与单纯采用外翻缝线进行垂直收紧相比,采用外翻缝线联合外侧睑板条进行水平和垂直睑收紧对睑内翻具有很高的疗效。回顾性病例系列研究也支持联合手术修复,但这些研究中关于特定手术技术的细节不能纳入分析。一项RCT的证据不太可能改变临床实践,因此我们仍然认为,显然需要更多的随机研究来比较两种或更多种睑内翻手术技术,以解决复发率和并发症发生率的问题。