Sbitan Lana, Tanous Haneen, Jardak Mira Nawfal, Camargo Cristina Pires
Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa 13133, Jordan.
Princess Basma Teaching Hospital, Ministry of Health, Irbid, Jordan.
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2024 Dec 3;80:100547. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100547. eCollection 2025.
Lower eyelid malposition, a commonly encountered eyelid disorder, is often linked to discomfort, visual disturbances, and cosmetic concerns. Various treatment modalities have been employed to address these conditions, but their effectiveness and safety remain subjects of debate. This systematic review, aiming to compare and evaluate these treatments, produced a comprehensive analysis of diverse approaches to managing lower eyelid malposition. The search encompassed electronic databases, clinical trial registries, and relevant journals from inception to September 2023. Fifteen studies meeting the inclusion criteria, involving 709 patients (855 eyelids), were reviewed, comprising 12 randomized controlled trials and 3 ongoing trials. We assessed the quality of each included study using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool for randomized trials (RoB v2). We analyzed success rates, recurrence rates, adverse events, and patient satisfaction. Results revealed that modifications to the conventional Lateral Tarsal Strip exhibited high success rates and low recurrence rates. Other treatments, including Everting Sutures, Retraction Pelication, and Orbicularis Muscle Shortening, showed promise in specific cases. Complications, generally mild and manageable, were reported across all modalities, with patients expressing overall satisfaction. The systematic review highlights the effectiveness and safety of various surgical interventions for lower eyelid malposition, offering durable outcomes and minimal recurrence. Tailoring treatments based on patient characteristics and anatomical variations is crucial. Further research is warranted to refine indications for each treatment option in this evolving field.
下睑位置异常是一种常见的眼睑疾病,常与不适、视觉障碍和美容问题相关。人们采用了各种治疗方法来处理这些情况,但其有效性和安全性仍存在争议。本系统评价旨在比较和评估这些治疗方法,对治疗下睑位置异常的多种方法进行了全面分析。检索范围包括电子数据库、临床试验注册库以及从创刊至2023年9月的相关期刊。对15项符合纳入标准的研究进行了综述,涉及709例患者(855只眼睑),其中包括12项随机对照试验和3项正在进行的试验。我们使用Cochrane随机试验偏倚风险工具(RoB v2)评估了每项纳入研究的质量。我们分析了成功率、复发率、不良事件和患者满意度。结果显示,对传统外侧睑板条进行改良显示出高成功率和低复发率。其他治疗方法,包括外翻缝合、退缩襞成形术和眼轮匝肌缩短术,在特定病例中显示出前景。所有治疗方式均报告有并发症,一般较轻且可处理,患者总体表示满意。该系统评价强调了各种手术干预治疗下睑位置异常的有效性和安全性,提供了持久的疗效和最小的复发率。根据患者特征和解剖变异定制治疗方案至关重要。在这个不断发展的领域,有必要进行进一步的研究以完善每种治疗选择的适应症。