Suppr超能文献

[具有相同活性成分的药物的产品特性摘要(SmPC)之间的禁忌证数量差异——对神经精神药物SmPC数据的分析]

[Different number of contraindications between summaries of product characteristics (SmPC) of drugs with the same active ingredients - an analysis of data from SmPCs of neuropsychiatric drugs].

作者信息

Gahr Maximilian, Freudenmann Roland W, Connemann Bernhard J, Schönfeldt-Lecuona Carlos, Muche Rainer, Hiemke Christoph, Sillmann Yannick M

机构信息

Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie III, Universitätsklinikum Ulm.

Institut für Epidemiologie und Medizinische Biometrie, Universität Ulm.

出版信息

Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2020 Mar;88(3):152-169. doi: 10.1055/a-0893-6601. Epub 2019 May 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In the case of prescriptions of pharmaceuticals in the context of the aut-idem-regulation the physician frequently does not know, which same-substance medication is dispensed in the pharmacy; the contemplable same-substance medications may differ in numerous features which raises questions regarding the obligation to give information and medical liability for medical malpractice. Currently, systematic evaluations regarding differences between summaries of product characteristics (SmPCs) of same-substance medications are missing. To determine size and type of those differences SmPCs of most (neuro)psychiatric drugs that are approved in Germany were evaluated regarding the number of listed contraindications (CI).

METHODS

Basis for the selection of substances was the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System (group ATC N Nervous System). Substances that are approved in Germany for the treatment of mental disorders according to ICD-10 F were included. Brand-name medications and SmPCs were searched by means of further in- and exclusion criteria via the online services of PharmNet.Bund, Gelbe Liste, Rote Liste/Fachinfo-Service and communication with the manufacturer.

RESULTS

N = 941 SmPCs (=116 substances) were evaluated. Considering only the group of SmPCs with > 1 brand-name medication (n = 78; 67.2 %) differences in the number of CIs were found in more than the half of substances (N = 43; 55.1 %). Considering indication groups most groups of SmPCs of same-substance medications with differences in the numbers of CIs were found in - considering only substances with > 1 brand-name medication - hypnotics and sedatives (77.8 %), anxiolytics (75.0 %), drugs for treatment of substance use disorders (66.7 %), antidepressants (61,9 %), anticonvulsant drugs and mood stabilizers (53.8 %), followed by antipsychotics (41.2 %), antidementia-drugs (20.0 %), and psychostimulants (0 %). Largest ranges regarding the number of CIs were found in the SmPCs of morphine (14), amitriptyline (8), chlorprothixene (6), lorazepam (6) and citalopram (4).

CONCLUSION(S): In numerous (neuro-)psychopharmacologic substances differences exists between the SmPCs of the associated same-substance medications regarding the number of CIs. Due to the outstanding evaluation of content aspects of these differences and legal evaluation the relevance of this result for clinical practice is not yet clear.

摘要

目的

在自体等同规则背景下开具药品处方时,医生常常不知道药房配发的同一种物质的药物是什么;可考虑的同一种物质的药物在众多特征上可能存在差异,这就引发了关于信息告知义务以及医疗过失的医疗责任问题。目前,缺乏对同一种物质药物的产品特性摘要(SmPCs)之间差异的系统评估。为了确定这些差异的大小和类型,对德国批准的大多数(神经)精神科药物的SmPCs中列出的禁忌证(CI)数量进行了评估。

方法

物质选择的依据是解剖治疗化学(ATC)分类系统(ATC N组 神经系统)。纳入了根据ICD - 10 F在德国被批准用于治疗精神障碍的物质。通过PharmNet.Bund、黄名单、红名单/专业信息服务的在线服务以及与制造商沟通,借助进一步的纳入和排除标准搜索品牌药物和SmPCs。

结果

评估了N = 941份SmPCs(= 116种物质)。仅考虑具有> 1种品牌药物的SmPCs组(n = 78;67.2%),超过一半的物质(N = 43;55.1%)在CI数量上存在差异。考虑适应证组,在仅考虑具有> 1种品牌药物的物质时,发现同一种物质药物的大多数SmPCs组在CI数量上存在差异,其中催眠药和镇静药(77.8%)、抗焦虑药(75.0%)、用于治疗物质使用障碍的药物(66.7%)、抗抑郁药(61.9%)、抗惊厥药和心境稳定剂(53.8%),其次是抗精神病药(41.2%)、抗痴呆药(20.0%)和精神振奋药(0%)。在吗啡(14种)、阿米替林(8种)、氯丙硫蒽(6种)、劳拉西泮(6种)和西酞普兰(4种)的SmPCs中发现CI数量的最大范围。

结论

在众多(神经 - )精神药理学物质中,相关同一种物质药物的SmPCs在CI数量上存在差异。由于对这些差异的内容方面评估以及法律评估尚不充分,该结果对临床实践的相关性尚不清楚。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验