Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy III, University Hospital of Ulm, Leimgrubenweg 12-14, 89075, Ulm, Germany.
Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, University of Ulm, Schwabstr. 13, 89075, Ulm, Germany.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Mar;78(3):419-434. doi: 10.1007/s00228-021-03209-7. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
In aut-idem or generic substitution, discrepancies between summaries of product characteristics (SmPCs) referring to the same active substance (AS) may cause difficulties regarding informed consent and medical liability. The qualitative and quantitative characteristics of such discrepancies are insufficiently studied, impeding harmonization of same-substance SmPCs and compromising safe drug treatment.
SmPCs of the one hundred most frequently prescribed ASs in Germany were analyzed for discrepancies in the presentation of indications (Inds) and contraindications (CInds). Inclusion and exclusion criteria of drugs/SmPCs were chosen according to the standards of the aut-idem substitution in Germany.
According to the study protocol, we identified 1486 drugs, of which 1426 SmPCs could be obtained. 41% respectively 65% of the ASs had same-substance SmPCs that differed from the respective reference SmPC in the number of listed Inds respectively CInds. The number of listed Inds/CInds varied considerably between same-substance SmPCs with maximum ranges in Inds of 7 in amoxicillin, and in CInds of 11 in lisinopril. Many ASs had large proportions (> 50%) of associated same-substance SmPCs that differed from the respective reference SmPC. A considerable proportion of ASs had same-substance SmPCs with formal and content-related differences other than the discrepancy in the number of Inds/CInds.
This evaluation of same-substance SmPCs shows a clear lack of harmonization of same-substance SmPCs. Considering that generic substitution has become the rule and that physicians usually do not know which drug the patient receives in the pharmacy, these discrepancies raise several questions, that require a separate legal evaluation.
在同一药物(AS)的产品特性摘要(SmPC)中,若出现差异,可能会导致知情同意和医疗责任方面出现问题。这些差异的定性和定量特征研究不足,阻碍了相同物质 SmPC 的协调统一,危及安全的药物治疗。
分析了德国最常开处方的一百种 AS 的 SmPC,以研究适应证(Inds)和禁忌证(CInds)的表述差异。药物/SmPC 的纳入和排除标准根据德国同一药物替代的标准选择。
根据研究方案,我们确定了 1486 种药物,其中 1426 种 SmPC 可以获得。分别有 41%和 65%的 AS 具有相同物质的 SmPC,与各自的参考 SmPC 在列出的 Inds 和 CInds 数量上有所不同。相同物质 SmPC 中列出的 Inds/CInds 数量差异很大,阿莫西林的 Inds 数量最多,为 7 种,赖诺普利的 CInds 数量最多,为 11 种。许多 AS 具有很大比例(>50%)的相关相同物质 SmPC,与各自的参考 SmPC 不同。相当一部分 AS 的相同物质 SmPC 存在形式和内容上的差异,而不仅仅是 Inds/CInds 数量上的差异。
对相同物质 SmPC 的评估表明,相同物质 SmPC 的协调统一明显不足。考虑到通用替代已成为惯例,并且医生通常不知道患者在药房收到哪种药物,这些差异引发了一些问题,需要进行单独的法律评估。