Kang-Yi Christina D
Center for Mental Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 May 24;8(5):e14382. doi: 10.2196/14382.
Previous research has reported that public-academic partnerships (PAPs) can effectively promote PAP leaders' use of research evidence in improving youth outcomes. However, the existing literature has not yet clarified whether and how PAP leaders' use of research evidence evolves along the PAP life cycle and whether PAP partners' concordant perceptions of usefulness of their PAP has an impact on PAP leaders' use of research evidence. Developing a conceptual framework that recognizes the PAP life cycle and empirically identifying contexts and mechanisms of PAPs that promote PAP leaders' use of research evidence from the PAP life cycle perspective are imperative to guide researchers and policymakers to successfully lead PAPs and foster policymakers' use of research evidence for improving youth outcomes.
Utilizing an integrated framework of organizational life cycle perspective, a social partnership perspective, and a realist evaluation, this study examines the extent to which PAP development and PAP leaders' use of research evidence can be characterized into life cycle stages and identifies PAP contexts and mechanisms that explain the progress of PAPs and PAP leaders' use of research evidence through life cycle stages.
Recruiting PAPs across the United States that aim to improve mental health and promote well-being of youth aged 12-25 years, the study conducts a document analysis and an online survey of PAPs to inform policymakers and academic researchers on the contexts and mechanisms to increase PAP sustainability and promote policymakers' use of research evidence in improving youth outcomes.
Fifty-three PAPs that meet the recruitment criteria have been identified, and document review of PAPs and participant recruitment for the online survey of PAP experience have been conducted.
This paper will help policymakers and researchers gain a deeper knowledge of the contexts and mechanisms for each PAP life cycle stage in order to optimize PAP leaders' use of research evidence in achieving positive youth outcomes.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/14382.
以往研究报告称,公共-学术伙伴关系(PAPs)能够有效促进PAP领导者运用研究证据改善青少年状况。然而,现有文献尚未阐明PAP领导者对研究证据的运用是否以及如何随PAP生命周期演变,以及PAP伙伴对其PAP有用性的一致认知是否会影响PAP领导者对研究证据的运用。构建一个认识PAP生命周期的概念框架,并从PAP生命周期角度实证确定促进PAP领导者运用研究证据的PAP背景和机制,对于指导研究人员和政策制定者成功引领PAPs以及促使政策制定者运用研究证据改善青少年状况至关重要。
本研究运用组织生命周期视角、社会伙伴关系视角和现实主义评价的综合框架,考察PAP发展及PAP领导者对研究证据的运用在多大程度上可划分为生命周期阶段,并确定能解释PAPs进展及PAP领导者在生命周期各阶段对研究证据运用情况的PAP背景和机制。
该研究招募了美国各地旨在改善12至25岁青少年心理健康和促进其福祉的PAPs,对PAPs进行文献分析和在线调查,以便为政策制定者和学术研究人员提供有关提高PAP可持续性以及促使政策制定者运用研究证据改善青少年状况的背景和机制信息。
已识别出53个符合招募标准的PAPs,并对PAPs进行了文献审查以及针对PAP经验在线调查的参与者招募。
本文将帮助政策制定者和研究人员更深入地了解每个PAP生命周期阶段的背景和机制,以便优化PAP领导者运用研究证据实现青少年积极成果的情况。
国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/14382