Jagosh Justin, Bush Paula L, Salsberg Jon, Macaulay Ann C, Greenhalgh Trish, Wong Geoff, Cargo Margaret, Green Lawrence W, Herbert Carol P, Pluye Pierre
Centre for the Advancement of Realist Evaluation and Synthesis, Waterhouse Building, Block B, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.
Department of Family Medicine, 5858 Ch. de la Cote-des-Neiges, 3rd floor, Montreal, QC, H3S 1Z1, Canada.
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 30;15:725. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1949-1.
Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) is an approach in which researchers and community stakeholders form equitable partnerships to tackle issues related to community health improvement and knowledge production. Our 2012 realist review of CBPR outcomes reported long-term effects that were touched upon but not fully explained in the retained literature. To further explore such effects, interviews were conducted with academic and community partners of partnerships retained in the review. Realist methodology was used to increase the understanding of what supports partnership synergy in successful long-term CBPR partnerships, and to further document how equitable partnerships can result in numerous benefits including the sustainability of relationships, research and solutions.
Building on our previous realist review of CBPR, we contacted the authors of longitudinal studies of academic-community partnerships retained in the review. Twenty-four participants (community members and researchers) from 11 partnerships were interviewed. Realist logic of analysis was used, involving middle-range theory, context-mechanism-outcome configuration (CMOcs) and the concept of the 'ripple effect'.
The analysis supports the central importance of developing and strengthening partnership synergy through trust. The ripple effect concept in conjunction with CMOcs showed that a sense of trust amongst CBPR members was a prominent mechanism leading to partnership sustainability. This in turn resulted in population-level outcomes including: (a) sustaining collaborative efforts toward health improvement; (b) generating spin-off projects; and (c) achieving systemic transformations.
These results add to other studies on improving the science of CBPR in partnerships with a high level of power-sharing and co-governance. Our results suggest sustaining CBPR and achieving unanticipated benefits likely depend on trust-related mechanisms and a continuing commitment to power-sharing. These findings have implications for building successful CBPR partnerships to address challenging public health problems and the complex assessment of outcomes.
基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)是一种研究人员与社区利益相关者建立公平伙伴关系以解决与社区健康改善和知识生产相关问题的方法。我们在2012年对CBPR成果进行的实证性综述报告了长期影响,这些影响在留存文献中有所提及,但未得到充分解释。为了进一步探究此类影响,我们对综述中留存的伙伴关系的学术和社区伙伴进行了访谈。采用实证性方法来加深对成功的长期CBPR伙伴关系中支持伙伴关系协同效应因素的理解,并进一步记录公平伙伴关系如何带来诸多益处,包括关系的可持续性、研究及解决方案。
基于我们之前对CBPR的实证性综述,我们联系了综述中留存的学术 - 社区伙伴关系纵向研究的作者。对来自11个伙伴关系的24名参与者(社区成员和研究人员)进行了访谈。采用了实证性分析逻辑,包括中程理论、情境 - 机制 - 结果配置(CMOcs)以及“涟漪效应”概念。
分析支持了通过信任来发展和加强伙伴关系协同效应的核心重要性。“涟漪效应”概念与CMOcs相结合表明,CBPR成员之间的信任意识是导致伙伴关系可持续性的一个突出机制。这反过来又产生了人群层面的结果,包括:(a)维持为改善健康而进行的协作努力;(b)产生衍生项目;(c)实现系统性变革。
这些结果补充了其他关于在高度权力共享和共同治理的伙伴关系中改进CBPR科学的研究。我们的结果表明,维持CBPR并实现意外益处可能取决于与信任相关的机制以及对权力共享的持续承诺。这些发现对于建立成功的CBPR伙伴关系以应对具有挑战性的公共卫生问题和对结果进行复杂评估具有启示意义。