• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠癌患者腹腔镜与开放保肛手术围手术期临床病理结果及术后生存情况比较:一项回顾性研究

Comparison of perioperative clinicopathologic outcome and postoperative survival of laparoscopic and open sphincter-sparing surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Zhang Zhanzhi, Zhang Benqiang Rao Zhipeng Sun Nengwei

机构信息

General Surgery Department, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, P. R. China.

出版信息

J BUON. 2019 Mar-Apr;24(2):464-469.

PMID:31127992
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the perioperative clinicopathologic outcome and postoperative survival of sphincter-sparing surgery by laparoscopic and open approach for patients with rectal cancer. Μethods: From January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2011, laparoscopic sphincter-sparing surgery and open sphincter-sparing surgery was performed in 228 patients with rectal cancer who were included in this study as open group (N=112) and laparoscopic group (N=116), respectively. The average follow-up time was approximately 5 years.

RESULTS

Spearman's test showed that there was a slight negative correlation in overall survival and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade (Spearman's r=-0.146, p=0.028), History of abdominal surgery (Spearman's r=-0.134, p=0.044) of all patients was statistically significant. There was no significant difference in survival between laparoscopic and open group (p=0.988). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the total overall survival rates after laparoscopic and open sphincter-sparing surgery were similar in both groups. Log rank test showed that there were significant differences in overall survival among different ypTNM stages (pathological TNM after neoadjuvant chemotherapy) (p=0.002) and Charlson comorbidity index (p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with open approach, laparoscopic sphincter-sparing surgery of rectal cancer had less intraoperative bleeding, less postoperative complications and faster recovery of intestinal function after operation. Survival of open surgery and laparoscopic rectal sphincter preservation surgery was similar in both groups. ypTNM stage and Charlson comorbidity index are the risk factors affecting the survival of patients with rectal cancer.

摘要

目的

探讨腹腔镜和开放手术保肛治疗直肠癌患者的围手术期临床病理结果及术后生存率。方法:2008年1月1日至2011年12月31日,对228例直肠癌患者分别行腹腔镜保肛手术和开放保肛手术,分为开放组(N = 112)和腹腔镜组(N = 116)。平均随访时间约5年。

结果

Spearman检验显示,所有患者的总生存率与美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级(Spearman秩相关系数r = -0.146,p = 0.028)、腹部手术史(Spearman秩相关系数r = -0.134,p = 0.044)呈轻度负相关,差异有统计学意义。腹腔镜组和开放组的生存率差异无统计学意义(p = 0.988)。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示,腹腔镜和开放保肛手术后两组的总生存率相似。Log秩检验显示,不同ypTNM分期(新辅助化疗后的病理TNM)(p = 0.002)和Charlson合并症指数(p = 0.03)的总生存率有显著差异。

结论

与开放手术相比,腹腔镜直肠癌保肛手术术中出血少、术后并发症少且术后肠功能恢复快。开放手术和腹腔镜直肠保肛手术两组患者的生存率相似。ypTNM分期和Charlson合并症指数是影响直肠癌患者生存的危险因素。

相似文献

1
Comparison of perioperative clinicopathologic outcome and postoperative survival of laparoscopic and open sphincter-sparing surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a retrospective study.直肠癌患者腹腔镜与开放保肛手术围手术期临床病理结果及术后生存情况比较:一项回顾性研究
J BUON. 2019 Mar-Apr;24(2):464-469.
2
Laparoscopic versus open techniques in rectal cancer surgery: a retrospective analysis of 121 sphincter-saving procedures in a single institution.腹腔镜与开放技术在直肠癌手术中的应用:单中心 121 例保肛手术的回顾性分析。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):454-62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1191-y. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
3
Quality of life after laparoscopic vs open sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancer.腹腔镜与开腹保肛直肠肿瘤切除术患者的生活质量比较。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug 7;19(29):4764-73. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i29.4764.
4
[Risk factor analysis on anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer patient with neoadjuvant therapy and establishment of a nomogram prediction model].[新辅助治疗直肠癌患者腹腔镜手术后吻合口漏的危险因素分析及列线图预测模型的建立]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Aug 25;22(8):748-754. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.08.009.
5
Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open surgery for stages II and III rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗II期和III期直肠癌的长期肿瘤学结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 14;21(18):5505-12. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5505.
6
Comparison of efficacy between natural orifice specimen extraction without abdominal incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of sigmoid colon cancer and upper rectal cancer.经自然腔道标本取出术(NOTES)与传统腹腔镜手术治疗乙状结肠癌和上段直肠癌的疗效比较
J BUON. 2019 Sep-Oct;24(5):1817-1823.
7
Time to initiation of postoperative chemotherapy: an outcome measure for patients undergoing laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer.术后化疗起始时间:接受腹腔镜直肠癌切除术患者的一个结局衡量指标。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Aug;56(8):945-51. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318290ce30.
8
Bowel dysfunction after anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic sphincter-saving operative intervention for rectal cancer: A case-matched study in 46 patients using the Low Anterior Resection Score.腹腔镜保肛手术治疗直肠癌吻合口漏后肠道功能障碍:一项对46例患者采用低位前切除评分的病例对照研究
Surgery. 2017 Apr;161(4):1028-1039. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.037. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
9
Intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: laparoscopic vs open surgery approach.经肛门内外括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌:腹腔镜与开腹手术比较。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jan;14(1):35-41; discussion 42-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02528.x.
10
Comparative evaluation of immune response after laparoscopical and open total mesorectal excisions with anal sphincter preservation in patients with rectal cancer.腹腔镜与开放全直肠系膜切除术保留肛门括约肌治疗直肠癌患者后免疫反应的比较评估
World J Gastroenterol. 2003 Dec;9(12):2690-4. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i12.2690.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopy is non-inferior to open surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗直肠癌的非劣效性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jul;13(13):e7363. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7363.
2
Similarities and differences between study designs in short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, case-matched, and cohort studies.腹腔镜与开放直肠癌低位前切除术短期和长期结局研究设计的异同:一项对随机、病例匹配和队列研究的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020 Nov 21;5(2):183-193. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12409. eCollection 2021 Mar.