Ding Yu, Li Zenan, Gao Haiting, Cao Yu, Jin Weisen
Institute of Anorectalology, the Third Medical Centre, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
J BUON. 2019 Sep-Oct;24(5):1817-1823.
To compare the short-term efficacy between natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) without abdominal incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of sigmoid colon cancer and upper rectal cancer.
A total of 86 patients scheduled to undergo laparoscope-assisted radical surgery of sigmoid cancer or upper rectal cancer from January 2015 to September 2017 (T1-3 stages in preoperative imaging evaluation, no distant metastasis, and body mass index <28 kg/m2) were selected and randomly divided into the NOSE group (no abdominal incision, n=43) and conventional laparoscopy group (LA group, n=43). The operation time, amount of intraoperative bleeding, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative diet time, postoperative hospitalization duration, postoperative pain score and perioperative complications were compared between the two groups. The pathological conditions of surgical specimens were recorded. The postoperative recurrence rate of tumor and survival rate of patients were also recorded and compared.
The general clinical features were comparable between the two groups, and there were no perioperative deaths. The operation time in NOSE group was slightly longer than that in LA group, without statistically significant difference (p=0.130). In NOSE group, the amount of intraoperative bleeding was significantly smaller than in LA group [(59.31±14.64) mL vs. (75.41±18.16) mL, p<0.001], the postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score was significantly lower than that in LA group [(4.2±1.6) points vs. (5.9±1.4) points, p<0.001], and the postoperative exhaust time and regular diet time were significantly shorter than those in LA group [(2.1±1.0) d vs. (2.6±1.2) d, p=0.039, (3.8±1.1) d vs. (4.4±1.4) d, p=0.030]. The cosmetic result in NOSE group was better than that in LA group [(8.0±1.5) vs. (6.4±1.1), p<0.001]. Moreover, the comparison results of surgical specimens showed that there were no statistically significant differences in the intestine resection length, proximal and distal resection margins, tumor size, number of lymph nodes dissected and TNM stage of tumor between the two groups (p>0.05). The postoperative tumor recurrence rate had no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.359), and the Log-rank test revealed that the disease-free survival (DFS) rate had no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.280).
NOSE without abdominal incision has a comparable short-term clinical efficacy to conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of sigmoid cancer and upper rectal cancer, but it significantly reduces the amount of intraoperative bleeding and lowers the pain of patients, with rapid postoperative recovery and high safety, so it is worthy of clinical popularization.
比较无腹部切口的经自然腔道标本取出术(NOSE)与传统腹腔镜手术治疗乙状结肠癌和上段直肠癌的短期疗效。
选取2015年1月至2017年9月计划行腹腔镜辅助乙状结肠癌或上段直肠癌根治术的86例患者(术前影像学评估为T1 - 3期,无远处转移,体重指数<28 kg/m²),随机分为NOSE组(无腹部切口,n = 43)和传统腹腔镜组(LA组,n = 43)。比较两组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间、术后进食时间、术后住院时间、术后疼痛评分及围手术期并发症。记录手术标本的病理情况。同时记录并比较患者术后肿瘤复发率及生存率。
两组一般临床特征具有可比性,围手术期均无死亡病例。NOSE组手术时间略长于LA组,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.130)。NOSE组术中出血量显著少于LA组[(59.31±14.64)mL vs.(75.41±18.16)mL,p<0.001],术后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分显著低于LA组[(4.2±1.6)分 vs.(5.9±1.4)分,p<0.001],术后排气时间和正常进食时间显著短于LA组[(2.1±1.0)d vs.(2.6±1.2)d,p = 0.039,(3.8±1.1)d vs.(4.4±1.4)d,p = 0.030]。NOSE组美容效果优于LA组[(8.0±1.5)vs.(6.4±1.1),p<0.001]。此外,手术标本比较结果显示,两组间肠管切除长度、切缘近端和远端、肿瘤大小、清扫淋巴结数目及肿瘤TNM分期差异均无统计学意义(p>0.05)。两组术后肿瘤复发率差异无统计学意义(p = 0.359),Log - rank检验显示两组无病生存率差异无统计学意义(p = 0.280)。
无腹部切口的NOSE在治疗乙状结肠癌和上段直肠癌方面与传统腹腔镜手术具有相当的短期临床疗效,但能显著减少术中出血量,降低患者疼痛程度,术后恢复快且安全性高,值得临床推广。